a campaign speech. when he talks about vague and idealistic stuff, he can talk about hope and change. but talking about specifics, a lot of people are out of work, and he just loses it. he was in his perfect environment. he presented it and looked well. what is your take? i thought he was correct in the rhetoric, but he spent so much time on it, it seemed like maybe he was saying it was part of the reason that he talked about it for so long. yes, and if he was going to bring that up, and if he was going to go there and see to it that all-americans understood the message of saville tee and whatever he defines that to mean, i don t consider a lot of the actions he has done to be civil, frankly. but if he is going to call for us to be civil, i want him calling out those media hacks. if he doesn t want to do it by name, he needs to say that people on the left have done outrageous things. sarah palin has been the victim of unprecedented death threats at this point. that wasn t ared by a