An america tonight special report, flashpoint ferguson. Im julie chen, we are live in ferguson. Developments are taking place behind me, they give you an indication of how difficult the weekend was, and the concerns going into this week. There was demonstrations and where we are gives you an indication of what Law Enforcement is doing to change things up. They have taken a tough position in trying to hold off a repeat of the weekend, creating roadblocks. Bull horn orders given to demonstrators gathered around the area telling them you can march, but if you stop, you get a warning, and youll go to gaol. They have taken a firm line, trying to prevent the kind of event that took place when the tear gas was thrown, and other gas bombs and molotov kaz bombs, according to the police, were used by demonstrators in the streets. There were more agitation when an autopsy report was released, commissioned by Michael Browns family, the unarmed 18yearold killed. Youll see the demonstrations faking
Around fraudulent fraudulent draws, not around the technology of the use of the credit card itself. I was going to add, we talked about security and confidentiality. We didnt mention the availability part. People talk about the triad that comes up a lot and this is a case of availability, people are dependent on a system in order to eat and this is not having that secured against an attack is a place where the security failed a group of very Vulnerable People and again, nothing to do with confidentiality but availability, we have to think about that, as well. One of the sayings in communities that are focused on Economic Justice or Community Development is that systems for the poor are poor systems. And hopefully well see that changing in the future. I saw a hand go up here. Yes, this gentleman in the green. My question is about the like the topography or the geography of how the Digital World actually appears. Just thinking about the weather these days and about that weather doesnt fo
So i had spent time in the field where im observing people in the classroom, usually older adults, again, someone, you know, that has limited language, english language skills, who spends someone who spends at least three classes literally trying to figure out how to drag the mouse from one side of the computer screen to the other right . So thats the first bit. The second bit, usually the last five weeks of the class, is in understanding what in the world is a username . And the password. And so what ive seen is, you know, just like this complete cognitive dissident as to what does is mean to have an identity online, you know, people are definitely choosing insecure passwords, something that is easy to remember. And if you have low literate skills or limited english skills, youre going to pick something that is much easier to remember that a computer could decipher quite easily. You are more than likely sharing your password and username with other individuals because youve not done t
To take on these tools and pick them up and use them actively even if you dont particularly feel that you are a member. We have time for questions. Im just going to open up to the floor, and i know that we have a cache hashtag where people are potentially joining our conversation and i will point out to those of you listening it is newamcyber. We have questions . Yes, in the back. One of the most disenfranchised groups in afghanistan are the women that fight every day for a quality. We established the trust of the network. We think it is a matter of life and death and not just whether you lose your account. There is a secure means by which you can get on the network through the portal entirely secure and they can discuss issues from everything from Small Businesses that they are attempting to educational issues. So there are things out there when it comes to the portal technologies that are secure enough for people especially those in a difficult situation like women and children are i
Savage, Supreme Court correspondent for the los angeles times. Host professor Kenji Yoshino you have written a very interesting very thoughtful account of the 2010 trial in San Francisco where to couples challenged californias ban on samesex marriage. This was a trial that neither side wanted. Tell us why you decided to go back and write a book now. Guest at david first of all thank you so much for doing this interview. Its my great pleasure to be here today. I really got into thinking about this trial after chief judge ron walker issued his 136 page opinion with findings of fact on august the fourth of 2010 and i looked at that opinion and as somebody who has been working in the gay rights feel this opinion but different in kind from anything i had seen before. Its just thoughtfulness generally and so i asked my library and to pull the transcript of the trial and she came up with it in 13 volumes 2000 page transcript of the trial in closing arguments. When i first started reading it i