it is a remarkable moment where everything literally has to be sort is of laid out publicly because it is the only way to convince even some people that it is the only way to convince some people. sit not going to convince everybody. there is a huge desire to choose your own venture on news, in both parties. not just the province of one or the other. and both media environments among partisans. so i think it s interesting. i think that it is certainly it ties into what the new york times reported over the weekend. just lawmakers. i think lawmakers are tasked with having to follow the facts. sure. as we are as journalists. yeah. i understand people s echo chambers. jim door dan can t come on with a convincing argument that he has a hunch you can take it in different directions. i would question the proposition that they are tied into the facts. they are in the spin businesses, exclusion business.
attention from rand paul who said it s very tunnel trouble, and i ve just seen the press report, to i m about to have to look at what the response is and what the group is, and that kind of thing. it s very concerning. he s going to have to respond to this. jay carney made light of the foe controversy at yesterday s briefing when asked if huhhingel would withdraw his no, ma am nation nation. absolutely not. if my suggestion to the might have been found in the meetings of the friends of hamas. the white house too found itself on the defensive this week accused of withholding by a press corps fed up with its limited access after the press s weekend golfing trip to florida. said white house correspondent association president ed henry, says this is a fight for more access. it s not about golf. it s about transparency and access in a broader sense. the white house strategy is shutting out the papers of record in favor of softer media environments and direct messaging via social me