the defense and criminal investigative service sits on it. in this instabs, my understanding the information came in but the m.o.u. as well as perhaps fisa restrictions would have prevented the dcis agent from sharing it back to the army and d.o.d., the pentagon, without permission. depending on where the information came from. . . the committee will be in a better position to judge whether or not that was the right judgment. mechanisms certainly did exist if there was a desire to share that with the criminal justice we heard about the silo s before 9/11. allegedly, he has made talking about the one where the colonel said that maybe people should drop bombs on themselves and go to times square in new york. contacts with imam silos still in place? is there information not being shared? tremendous progress has been made. when it came to the jttf, as an indication that we have made a lot of progress. it is not clear to me that the information that was going to be sort
millions of lives were saved by dropping those two bombs because it brought the war to an end rather than forcing the japanese as their leaders intended to do to die to the last person to repel an invasion, then you would be an apologist, if you simply don t know the facts. but this puts us further at risk. we just simply cannot bough to this and the answer will bow to this and the answer will be, when the american people respond and let the white house know, let the department of justice know, burn up the phone lines, let them know about constant cause, i m not sure i would email this white house since they show what they do with the list, but at least burn up the phone lines letting them know that the commander in chief needs to act as a commander in chief and not an apologist in chief and that we should not put our soldiers at further risk by requiring them to gather forensic evidence, that we should not put the people at new york at further risk and to leave them at gua
get anything through the legislature. republicans hated r fo and the democrats hated her for being sarah palin. the ethics complaints and thirdly, her new political per sowna, she is now the most famous political woman in the world. now she beat hillary for it in the political press. she saw those and said, it s time to move on. one of the points i do make is i think the caller is right. there s a narrative that for many women, you have to trade off successful personal life for successful political success. she showed that was not the case. she was made fun of and ridiculed by the femanists. . . is from alaska. caller: first of all, i would like to say that sarah palin gave her reason for resigning, she owed $500,000 in legal fees for defending herself against so many ethics complaints, of which she was convicted, several of them, including taking money from the state for eating at her home, taking money for taking her family traveling around the her family traveling around