cause for celebration for the vast majority of th americans who agree with the supreme court, who wrote, racialeliminatinge discrimination means eliminating all of it. it cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. an abc ipsosething poll revealt 52% of americans agree with the decision to race based admissions. but sadly, this did not go over well with many democrats. new york congressman jamaal bowman said the court is illegitimate and that they re there to serve white supremacy and white patriarchy . the supreme court is here to serve oligarchs. oligar they re here to serve billionaires. they re here to servchey re her. they re here to serve white supremacy and white patriarchyr and nativism. they want to take away our civil rights. they want to take away our voting rights, our human s rights. , huma they want to make our country more dangerous by expanding concealen men s ri wand carry p they don t
free while the cause is thelive same. everyone has a different reason for serving free.e ca. maybe they re following in their father s footsteps, orserv they felt a calling after terrorists tore down the twin towersa call. for me, it was a patriotictr parade or a series oiotif them f a small town memorial day and the 4th of july parades in a tiny farm town in southern minnesota where my parents grewm up. the whole town linedinnesota wh on the side of the tree lined main street, waiting for the veterans u to walk by. and when they came, older vets u and younger vets, the crowd clapped and salutes,d. the reverence that town had for the veterans made me say, wow, those men really did something special, somethingme did biggern this town, something bigger than themselves. these men were willing to put on a uniform and facet fo danger for me. a kid they never met. it was just a handful of veterans from one town. but rans from one town. gave men like that. out of sheer patriot
asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
would be reversed, giving them another opportunity to blame republicanens. take a look. people think that the president of the uniteicans.d states, ther for debt forgiveness. s he does not. can he can postpone. he can p delayostpon. but he does not have that power. that would tha power t to bef congress. i m prepared to write off the $10,000 debt, but not 50. mr. president, let me ask you, because i don t think i have the authority to do it tigning a two year. yeah. and while the left spent the day complaining about the decisiont spening abou, mant celebrated the victory for millions of hardworking taxpayere victs, including missy senator eric schmidt, who launched thiers lawsuit whem he was attorney general of his state. schmidt wrote on twitter twittet biden s bailout was, quote, fundamentally unfair, unlawful and a cynica l election ploy,s woul adding that those without loans should notd have to pay off everyone else s. what a concept. senator schmidt join ons us n
meritocracy approve of this decisiony ap. a few d just a few days ago, cbs newss ran a poll asking americans about this very issue. ver70% responded that colleges should not be allowed to use race in college admissions. a new york times poll recentlyam found 60% of democrats also oppose race as a factor in admissions. americans across the country have rejected affirmative action at the ballot box, too, evenat the b in blue state calia in the 2020 election. democratic leaders in the state put affirmative action on the ballot. the pre action oo affirmative an activists, the governor, both supp senators, even the golden state warriors, pushed voters to support the initiativthey oe they outspent opponents of oppon affirmative action by 19 to 1. and in the end, nearly 60% of californians voted to kill affirmative action. . it didn t work. no matter how hard the democratic party matte trieo matter how much money spen wpin, the american people have rejected the view that we should b