Footage, dont expect more units. It doesnt even make sense. And as for the other neighbor who was happy having a family of three, i have a family of five. I mean, i wouldnt im i mean, we need three bedroom units. Two bedrooms may work for him or Something Like that, i suppose, but i hope that you would actually increase the square footage, and if you can fit in two units, that would be great. Thank you much for your time. President hillis thank you. Any additional Public Comment . Good evening, commissioners. Im actually the project sponsor. My name is kieran hardy. If you were the project sponsor, you had to speak during the presentation time. Okay. President hillis we may have questions for you. Any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson yeah, i cant be supportive of this. If you look at this lot if you look at the buildings adjacent to this lot to the left, im not sure if thats east or west, theyre multiunit, and clearly, theres some exc
Kitchen that la cocina. Southern exposure sent you an email yesterday morning saying that also, although they were tricked into supporting this, theyre not supporting this project. Theyre standing with the mission community, and the only people that are supporting it are the people that received money from four point foundation. And the 100 people that lori and i have, and the other 100 that kevin has, these are people that oppose this large scale project. Kevin is going to keep talking about it, and if you have any questions, ive lived on this street before 1984. I remember before tim bubuk2 c, and they already destroyed that block, and now theyre saying now they cant afford it. But they bought the building. They got it for a song 20 years ago. Its not an economic situation, its a greed situation, and its more money and more rent to be made off of my block, and it needs to be scaled off and not have 1,000 people dropped off in front of my house every day. Kevin ortiz, united save the
It would take to legalize, so karly can probably fill in the details. Sure, and this is one of the first removal of an unauthorized unit. Theres been a handful, but none of them have actually reached this no path to legalize issue. There was some inconsistency of how dbi was applying the standard and how planning was applying the standard. There was some confusion that the commissioners would actually be evaluating the Construction Cost or the cost to legalize. Dbi also believed that the scope of work was so extensive that the it would be infeasible for the Property Owner to legalize. Since this issue has come up on this project. Weve been working with dbi to clarify those standards and actually make them a little more arduous and closely related to life safety issues more so than a scope of work that may seem too extensive or to expensive because thats what youre going to be consider considered. Vice president richards sure. What bothers me is the Property Owner im not singling this P
Unit. So that was almost just as easy as a decision for us. This is not as much of a nobrainer because theres an existing house there. But one thing that pops up in my mind is the proximity to bart and the fact that for planning purposes, we should be densifying near the bart stations. It doesnt have a fourcar garage or anything like that. Its a fourunit building, which is if you think about it, it will make it more affordable than it would be if it stays asis. And proximity to bart is putting me over the fence on this one. It wouldnt be the end of the world if it was continued, but im supporting the project asis. Commissioner richards we talked last night and we talked about the dominos falling and this will be the first of the entire street and then there goes the entire street. And i asked you to provide us with a look at what the street looks like even though ive been there. This would be for the rest of the commissioners. And you said you would. Can you help us out by showing us w