Good morning. Welcome. Please be seated. We will begin by hearing argument in the two cases that are on that we will hear simultaneously, state of new york et al. Versus United States department of justice and make the road new york versus kuchali. May it please the cord, jerry sinzdak appearing on behalf of the United States. Good morning. Good morning. The District Courts injunctions are flawed in several respects and should be set aside. As a threshold matter plaintiffs have failed to assert recognizable injury and they seek to promote an interest that is diametrically opposed to the purpose of the public charge statute. It therefore lacks standing. On the merits as the District Court found im sorry, as the ninth circuit found the rule easily is a reasonable interpretation of the public charge provision. Congress made clear in 1996 that it sought to ensure that aliens admitted to the country do not rely on Public Benefits but didnt it do that by making them ineligible for the most p
Congress make clear in 1996 that it sought to ensure that aliens admitted to the country do not rely on Public Benefits. That by making them ineligible for the most part for those benefits . It did of course make them ineligible. Concludedhat congress that after you have been here for a number of years, you are eligible for benefits, that reflects that you cannot predict for total accuracy what they will need. Predictere trying to this regulation. Correct. A difference between saying we did not predict this and saying we will authorize you to use benefits. That is different. They were not eligible before this point. That is right. Did not expect you to use them. Congress had every opportunity to elaborate on the public charge revision. Instead, they ignore that, y had 20tanding that the years before. They chose to deal with the problem in a different way. Understand how you draw from that the fact that congress chose to deal with this. They did not want to create an incentive. By makin
Good morning. Welcome. We will begin by hearing arguments on the pieces we will hear simultaneously with the department of justice and this is flawed in several respects and should be satisfied is a personal matter and those that are diametrically opposed and on merit as the District Court found am sorry that im circuit found the rule that easily has a readable interpretation of the public charge. Congress made clear in 1996 that do not rely on Public Benefits by making them ineligible. Yes it did make them ineligible but the fact and then it concluded that yes after a certain number of years you are eligible at does not predict a certain accuracy. But you were trying to predict and then trying to predict who would be eligible. Yes but there is a difference to say that circumstance has been fallen you over the past five years. Because we have been here for a while. Because they are not eligible at this point. Thats right they havent been using them to say we didnt expect to five years
Number of homes, fire. A stressful few days for residents impacted by the fire. Most are back home but unfortunately some residents returning to find their homes damaged or destroyed by the seller and to fire. The family was evacuated safely here but the fire tore through the homes while they were gone and moved in about six months ago finished relationship you were here the Team Coverage watching evacuations will happen. All of them have been lifted the containment line around half of the fire. Someone hundred thousand evacuees returned to their homes late on saturday and early sunday. The fire burning nearly 2000 acres in two days across the Northern Edge of the san fernando valley. Cheryl schapiro has lived in the neighborhood for 30 years and said this is the fourth wildfire. This is the only one they could prepare for. The other ones had times to pack up their cars and get things ready. We got our dogs and medications and leave. We had no time to do anything. Reporter hurt home wa
[inaudible [inaudible conversations] the hearing will i welcome you all. [inaudible] we have a profound responsibility to do all that we can do. [inaudible] that could be trouble. All right. Can we get the rest on record as i get started here quick servicemembers put their lives and their health on the line when they put on theirand in return they have a profound responsibility to make sure that the nation is doing all that it can to keep us safe, to training casualties and provide the best possible care for those who are injured. We are holding this hearing because dod is not meeting its responsibility when it comes to traumatic brain injuries and other injuries that result from firing weapons. Injuries from the pressure thats caused by a shockwave that exceeds the normal atmospheric values have been signature with wounds of the wars in iraq and in afghanistan. But there are also injuries incurred in training home. They are invisible but they affect thousands of Service People causing