with an intellectual and developmental disabilities. here is wishing may luck later this month at her championship in florida. new day continues right now. i m john berman in new york with brianna keilar in washington on this new day, big step forward on america s road to reopen mchg when the first coronavirus vaccines could be available for children. mask confusion. the cdc s changing guidance leaving many americans wondering when and where to drop the mask. and new details on the war boiling over within the gop with party leaders turning on each other. and the mysterious string of sonic attacks now reaching u.s. soil. details inside the classified briefing that turned tense. welcome to our viewers in the united states and around the world, it s tuesday, may 4th. may the fourth be with you. pfizers coronavirus vaccine expected to be approved for 12 to 15-year-olds by this time next week as my 14-year-old told me, that is awesome. it could fuel a trend we re now
dollars so that they could stay open, be prepared, open safely, all of that. no many of them are saying we ll have to go virtual again. so the president criticized specifically some of the states and he s asking where did the money go? we also back then included an $10 billion for testing for schools. that money went out to the states. states and the school districts have spent the money well. many of them. unfortunately some haven t. martha: unfortunately some haven t. there s the podium. we re waiting for jen psaki that will probably get questions about this in terms of the accountability. where does the money go? if the money is supposed to be for testing and safe open schools, we don t we have that in some cases? we ll dig into that. that money was allocated for those specific things. why are we still seeing challenges? $72.8 billion allocated to testing and detecting the virus in an ample fashion over the course of 2020 and 2021. edward lawrence digging into this. he
well welcome, dade. good on with you. paul: thank you for coming in. the common refrain from a lot of people about this, particularly from democrats and many in the media, is this indictment shows that no one is above the law. what s your response to that argument? silly, silly sentence, i m afraid. nobody s below the law. the key question here is not even whether it s a strong case and, paul, it s an exceedingly weak case. but even if it was strong, in order to indict a former president you need to have an utterly compelling set of circumstances, really serious crime. and, frankly, the country that would not be epo lahrized about it be polarized about it. it s not to indict everything you think you can get out of a grand jury, it is to do good, and i see precious little good being done here. paul: so as a prosecutor with limited resources, think about it, not only what the technical legal violation might be, but whether or not this serves the cause of justice and,
up, to that view, to that view. that s life. pete: like waking up to red bull, you wake up to that music. listen to that. will: that s life? rachel: that is how i like to live my life, no doubt about it. will: let s do that. come up with the idyllic image of the morning. we found yours. bump in with those. rachel: next couple hours. will: prep time to get the shots. rachel: we can do it. america is a big beautiful place. pete: i have got mine. it is not wisconsin. rachel: only in the summer. pete: only in the summer. i will take that fa, that florida scene any day. will: that is absolutely believe. rachel: we re praying for the people of florida. they will be hit by a storm. we ll cover that all morning long. will: a hurricane forming headed to florida possibly tuesday making landfall. we ll keep you updated. on fox square another commodity competition. this one badminton. pete: you play a lot of badminton? will: zero. were you back up badminton. pete: played a lot in gym