making arguments, if the lawyers are going to talk to prosecutors that is around the time when there s going to be a transition of information. for example you might be a subject or we only see you as a witness, or depending on what you say, will affect your client. here we re way past that. the doj tell trump s lawyers in that big meeting we showed you monday, and saw jack smith cited, one of the only sightings we had this week. monday meeting they talked in person and now they have been informed from general he s a target. as for one of the most senior prosecutors who reports to jack smith, our cameras caught one of these top prosecutors at the courthouse. he also was not talking to the press. sir, can you confirm you are here for the grand jury? david. david. can you say anything?
the addendum to this filing is eye catching. it s a list of books before, during, and after, the trump presidency. what we ll do expect this to play in the trial? it remains to be seen. i think when you re talking about these kinds of evidence, in these pieces of evidence, a lot of people need to understand that it s going to be a function of the judge, and what the judge binds to be relevant. just because something is used during discovery, just because something is listed in a pleading, or filing, by a party, does not mean that is going to get in front of the jury. both sides will be making arguments as to the relevance, or lack thereof, of each of these pieces of evidence. especially when you re talking about things that were written either before, or certainly, long after the presidency. their relevance is going to be highly scrutinized, in a test that the judge is going to ply,, lindsey is one of prejudice, versus, basically, is a prejudicial, or is it a value greater than t
but there is a difference between having a particular point of view and the way the state attempts to govern peoples behavior. it very much matters that what desantis is doing is using the state power to limit peoples choices. instead of making arguments and saying i m against this and here s why, here s why i think it s unproductive or whatever, he is trying to use the heavy hand of the state to silence people he disagrees with. and that not to be anathema. he is a small government conservative until he needs to be a big government to believe. people mona charen and brandon wolf, thank you both for good evening. much appreciated. thanks to you at home for being with us. a bit of a sigh of relief in the
what do you see here, charlie? i would assess that language, in fact a lot of this filing in the say way you just did. this is a pattern of trump s legal teams. i say that plural because he s had so many different ones in all these different types of litigation around the country he s involved in. some criminal, some civil. and it is very common for those filings to be written in a way that seems unuse bible for a courtroom. they re making arguments that are quotable, that jump out. they re good for newspaper writers like me because they re not turgid, they re punchy. but they don t really make a legally cognizable point. and that one seems like it fits within the pattern of let s dirty up this case and create suspicion around it in the mind of the public that it is, you know, politicized in nature even if it s not attachable to a particular legal principle we re trying to advance. you notice it as trying to be
policy skills, making arguments on television. making arguments on retail basis to crowds. so as much a perhaps governor desantis and president trump and the others would prefer to walk into the nomination, in the end they re going to be thankful for a hard fought campaign because whomever they face on the democratic side, they will be strengthened and much more well positioned to take on the democrats. hannity: tommy, every poll will show, every election year you ask people what they think of negative ads. it s almost unanimous, they don t like negative ads. however, they are always used because they work. if you ask people, people are asking me, why are republicans fighting amongst each other at this early date? is it the same situation where they really like it but they won t admit that they like it? is it good for the process? i ll tell you this, and mark my words on this. nobody else besides ron desantis