our national security. within two hours of the president s departure, a suicide bomber rocked kabul. at least seven people were killed. the taliban is claiming responsibility for the attack. the nfl suspended four players from the new orleans saints today. anthony hargrove, scott fujita, will smith, and jonathan vilma were all named in the so-called bountygate scandal. players were allegedly offered bonuses for hurting players. the league has already suspended sean payton for the 2012 season. hillary clinton is in china there to talk economic strategy, but the name on everyone s lips is chen. that s chen guangcheng who is now we are told at a hospital in beijing. chen is the blind human rights activist who was convicted and thrown in jail for leading protests against the government. he spent six days under american embassy protection after escaping house arrest. it s not clear if he left the embassy by choice. a friend of the activist said chinese authorities threatened
candidate for the republican nomination for the president, has been kind enough to join us in our studios in washington, d.c., and he s joining us live this morning after what was surely a very stressful and busy day yesterday. i do hope you got some sleep, and thank you for being with us. our viewers do thank you, too. thank you, robin, and it was a busy day but i survived. this is why it was a busy day, and we re going to talk about many issues, but let s start with what s at the top of the news. many people are asking, did you say something early yesterday about sexual allegations against you but something completely different hours later? let s watch as things happened yesterday. if the restaurant association did a settlement, i am i wasn t even aware of it and i hope it wasn t for much because nothing happened. so if there was a settlement, it was handled by some of the other officers that worked for me at the association, so the answer is absolutely not. i am un
spokesperson and a father against those kind of lyrics. he opposes them but he does not think that that is the sum total of this particular artist s work which has been recognized by a lot of mainstream organizations and fair and balanced organizations like fox news. bill: that is completely disingenuous. carney s reference to fox news was taken from the far left propaganda web site media matters which highlights a freelance review done of common last year on foxnews.com. give me a break. the real issue that jay carney dodged is about appropriate behavior. murdered police officers, not something you rap about lightly. common has no idea what happened. yet, he has taken an irresponsible position. the president and first lady have made a major mistake in inviting this man to the white house. he surely does not deserve that honor.
privileged law. the concern by a lot of courts and also some journalists is that if you define journalists so broadly that you cover anyone with a blog, then it becomes a distinction without meaning and you ll lose protections of the media if everyone can be classified as a journalist. in my view, he is a journalist, but not a very good one if this is the way that he practices that profession. most mainstream organizations, most professional journalists do not engage in checkbook journalism. that s what this does appear to be. i mean, he paid $5,000 according to reports for something that is arguably stolen property. is it, in fact, stolen property? that may be at the heart of this, too, correct? yeah, under the california code, section 485, it is arguably stolen. just because somebody leaves a
the concern by a lot of courts and also some journalists is that if you define journalists so broadly that you cover anyone with a blog, then it becomes a distinction without meaning and you ll lose protections of the media if everyone can be classified as a journalist. in my view, he is a journalist, but not a very good one if this is the way that he practices that profession. most mainstream organizations, most professional journalists do not engage in checkbook journalism. that s what this does appear to be. i mean, he paid $5,000 according to reports for something that is arguably stolen property. is it, in fact, stolen property? that may be at the heart of this, too, correct? yeah, under the california code, section 485, it is arguably stolen. just because somebody leaves a