Will have to get back to you. Hasrter general kelly become a political conversation. We believe the last few minutes of todays White House Briefing to go to the Heritage Foundation for a panel on freedom of speech, what does it mean . Oflysts will debate if vincent van names should be allowed to receive the federal trademark as one example. Introduction are being made. You are watching live coverage on cspan. Hosting our discussion this afternoon is tiffany bates, legal policy analyst. She researches and writes about records, judicial nominations, and other constitutional issues. She is also cohost of heritages 101 podcast. She was a regular contributor to the daily signal, heritages multimedia organization, and she also coordinates a pellet advocacy program. Please join me in welcoming tiffani bates. Tiffani. [applause] thank you, and welcome to the Heritage Foundation, and thanks for joining us to celebrate free speech week by highlighting recent First Amendment victories. I look at
Mobile devices and sounds are turned off as he began and of course anyone watching on line is welcome to send a question at any time simply emailing speaker heritage. Org protesting our discussion this afternoon is Tiffany Bates legal policy and on the at our center for legal and judicial studies. She researches and writes about courts judicial nominations and other constitutional issues. She is also cohost of scotus 101 podcasts. She is a regular contributor to the daily signal media organization. She also coordinates the appellate advocacy program. Please join me in welcoming Tiffany Bates. Tiffany. [applause] thank you and welcome to Heritage Foundation and thanks for joining us to celebrate free speech read by highlighting recent First Amendment victories and hopefully as we will discuss later on the courts. Ill keep my remarks short so we can get to what we are all here for, the beer. This summer the Supreme Court reiterated that are free speech jurisprudence is that we protect th
Heritage foundation discussion on a court ruling on offensive language and freedom of speech. Containshour event language some viewers might find offensive. Good afternoon, welcome to the Heritage Foundation. This is the Sarah Allison auditorium. Who are hereose from our heritage. Org website, and on cspan tv. For those inhouse, we would ask a courtesy that mobile devices are silenced or turned off. Isone watching online welcome to send a question at any time, emailing speaker at heritage. Org. Bateseaker is tiffany legal policy analyst. , she researches and writes about records, judicial nominations, and other constitutional issues. She is also cohost of heritages 101 podcast. She was a regular contributor to the daily signal, heritages multimedia organization, and she also coordinates a pellet advocacy program. Please join me in welcoming tiffany bates. Tiffany. [applause] thank you, and welcome to the Heritage Foundation, and thanks for joining us to celebrate free speech week by hi
On friday, cspan set down with Hillary Clinton to discuss her recent book. She spoke about Media Coverage of the 2016 president ial campaign. You say in the book that the media needs to do its own soul searching. One of the things about cspan, and i am not just flattering you but you guys cover everything and let other people draw their own conclusions. I understand the pressures that the press is under. Ad dollarsot to get or eyeballs or clicks. I get that. But, our president ial election is a big deal and now, we see what happens when someone is not bedded. Is not vetted. And people will say we talked about the hollywood access tape. And how much coverage did you give to the women who spoke up. Not much. I think the Trump Campaign did a good job of changing the subject all the time. Interview with Hillary Clinton tomorrow at 2 15 p. M. And 11 05 p. M. On book tv on cspan two. Now, a Heritage Foundation discussion on recent federal Court Rulings concerning offensive language and the f
Have focused more on the process instead of the people. I think it is a real sad moment when were focussed far more on the process of what time call was placed versus the fact that there was loss of military soldiers and there were individuals that were killed in action. We should be talking about the heroes. We should be talking about their lives and that hasnt been the focused. There are congressional leaders calling for an apology. Will there be an apology . Im sorry. Theres congressmen like Elijah Cummings calling for an apology from the chief of staff. I dont think that general kelly was wrong and i dont sympathy he should offer an apology. Where did he get that information . He was there. Everyone wants to narrow this down to a nineminute speech. This is something that took place over the course of the day. You have two different accounts. Im talking about when he raw and emotional accounts that anyone could give. I think he has a lot of credibility on this topic and a lot of cre