unrealistic. why not have a hearing, though? the democrats won t even allow for there to be a hearing so they can have a discussion about it. i think that s at least worthwhile. why is it unrealistic? the liquefy gas and then ship it is so expensive. granted, an option. in my opinion, a better option is to solidify the ukrainian pipelines, the russian pipelines that run through ukraine, and make sure that that continues to flow, and whatever it takes to do that, you make it happen. there are three major pipelines through ukraine to russia, to the other parts of yourm, to polan poland, romania. if you secure those, you don t need to liquefy but the head is in the soviet union. the headlines there are. they could turn them off, right? why would they do that? they turn them off, no one is going to pay their i understand that. let me get back to what dana said. there s been an existing ban on europe getting both natural gas and oil from the united states.