a conversation with russians during the transition. kislyak actually spoke to the attorney general. the carter page speech in moscow. all of this was by declaration of the liberal media criminal collusion. the problem is none of them could ever point to a criminal statute that makes collusion a crime except in antitrust law. and when they finally discovered that, i mean, i thought they were going to cry. you know, the problem is they don t know the first thing about the law. this is a case all about the law. and they haven t looked up the criminal statute or the case law on obstruction. they couldn t find any case law on collusion and so now they have resorted to interviewing playboy models and porn stars, you know, in an attempt to over a consensual relationship. sean: we have a lot to say about that on monday. you think about it though, in the process of all of, this we learned a lot. we did learn that the russians, they wanted to
create chaos. we did learn we know that hillary was hacked by probably the russians, the chinese the iranians, everybody because of the illegal server. she fixed a primary we know top people in the department of justice and fbi fixed and rigged an investigation into her server, exoneration before investigation. and then we know that she paid for russian information to influence the general election. that information was then used to obtain a fisa warrant even though unverified, turns out to be lies. and they purposefully mislead a fisa judge. we did learn a lot as a result of this. but it s not what the media wanted to find. you know, could i add one more thing also about collusion and the importance of not having any charge of collusion? because, remember, the conversation has turned in many ways to the idea of obstruction of justice that president trump has obstructed justice in the trump russia investigation. but collusion would be the underlying crime for that
sheep and the media. you hear the coverage. you see the coverage. house intel committee wrapped up their investigation, no evidence of collusion, no evidence of anything wrong in business dealings. you wrote a piece last night. what is your take overall? wouldn t we know by now if there was some collusion? i think we would. that was quite a montage by the way. yeah. look at what robert mueller has done look at the people he has charged. look at the people he has made plea agreements i has charged three people very highly placed in the trump campaign michael flynn, paul manafort and richard gates. you have to ask yourself if there were collusion these guys would probably be involved. they all did have some links to russia and yet all have been charged with crimes and none of those crimes have involved any sort of collusion, conspiracy, coordination between russia and the trump campaign. so, if you simply look at
sheep and the media. you hear the coverage. you see the coverage. house intel committee wrapped up their investigation, no evidence of collusion, no evidence of anything wrong in business dealings. you wrote a piece last night. what is your take overall? wouldn t we know by now if there was some collusion? i think we would. that was quite a montage by the way. yeah. look at what robert mueller has done look at the people he has charged. look at the people he has made plea agreements i has charged three people very highly placed in the trump campaign michael flynn, paul manafort and richard gates. you have to ask yourself if there were collusion these guys would probably be involved. they all did have some links to russia and yet all have been charged with crimes and none of those crimes have involved any sort of collusion, conspiracy, coordination between russia and the trump campaign. so, if you simply look at
so jeff zucker is trying a new tactic to hold up ever sinking and shrinking audience. take a look. the so-called facts first network has a new fixation. it s like soft core porn. that s right, this is cnn. after the pathetic trump collusion conspiracy blew up in faces. cnn is going absolutely wild wall-to-wall speculation about a consensual relationship between the president going back 12 years or so ago with a former porn star or current porn star stormy daniels. it s stormy 24/7. take a look at what cnn now considers journalism. stormy daniels, i know have you heard a ton about that and we have to see where that case goes and what this interview is about. is that possible to come up in the stormy daniels lawsuit? will she be able to say hey, look, this lawyer is involved with a whole bunch of different things here. this could be the last nail in the coffin. stormy daniels is causing stormy weather. porn star stormy daniels claims president trump broke