deranged dotard to an old lunatic. every source i have, every indication i m getting, it is highly unlikely there has been communication between president trump and kim jong-un. and nobody who follows the korea situation would describe the relationship between those two leaders as good. dave and christine? will ripley for us in seoul. thanks. president trump also tells the wall street journal he believes an fbi agent pulled off the russia probe committed treason. mr. trump says a text sent by peter strzok to an fbi lawyer he was having an affair with was treasonous because it suggested investigating collusion to get trump out of office if he won. an attorney for strzok called that accusation beyond reckless. to be clear, no one here has or should ever defend what peter strzok texted. a fireable offense. treason is defined in the constitution as aiding enemies of the u.s. or levying war against the nation just to be clear. not defending peter strzok s testimony just defining treason
lunatic. there has highly unlikely that there s been communication between president trump and kim jong-un. and nobody would describe their relationship good. thanks so much for that. president trump telling the wall street journal he should be getting credit for firing james comey. he suggests many things have been found out about the former fbi director. he calls him a leaker and a liar. mr. trump says a text sent by peter strok to an fbi lawyer he was having an affair with was treasonous because it suggested collusion getting trump out of office if he won. in case you re wondering treason is described as aiding enemies of the u.s. or levying war against the nation. ahead, major protests were set to greet the president during a planned visit to
francisco along with juan williams. the co-host of the five. all right, fine. can t say anything more without offending someone. i thought you actually hit the right point, which is from the perspective of the women, there is no ineld no indication here despite what lisa bloom may have been up to that they were in fact fabricating. their integrity is not the n. question here. what s in question is whether or not lisa bloom as a lawyer was really overstepping bounds either in terms of doing business with donors or potentially willing to take money from tabloids in exchange for the stories coming from the women. but, in terms of the charges, the women were lobbying levying against donald trump. there is no indication here that they were making things up, laura. laura: march meet, your reaction to this.
williams. the co-host of the five. all right, fine. can t say anything more without offending someone. i thought you actually hit the right point, which is from the perspective of the women, there is no ineld no indication here despite what lisa bloom may have been up to that they were in fact fabricating. their integrity is not the n. question here. what s in question is whether or not lisa bloom as a lawyer was really overstepping bounds either in terms of doing business with donors or potentially willing to take money from tabloids in exchange for the stories coming from the women. but, in terms of the charges, the women were lobbying levying against donald trump. there is no indication here that they were making things up, laura. laura: march meet, your reaction to this. $750,000 offered? they were in touch with
directed mike allegation fwlcha. we know that kushner was also present at that meeting at trump tower, kushner and investigators met for less than an hour to provide information sought by the special counsel. what is jared kushner s exposure here, potential exposure? i think it is pretty big. because the two things, what this in-dimdictment tells us, f is admitting that he talked to the russians bts u. s about the government sanctions that we were levying against russia and, two, he was talking he was admitting that he had discussions with the russians about blocking a u.n. security council resolution which was anti-israeli, against the not anti-israeli, against the settlements in israel. so he was taking action. he was discussing with the