a very narrow definition of treason, which is levying war against the united states, et cetera. bribery, closer call because he is trying to use something of value. the 400 million in aid to accomplish something. but i think the republicans have a good argument against that which is that bribery usually directed towards an individual for some kind of legal act. this is toward a government. and arguably it s not really an illegal act. it s military aid or talking about corruption in general. so there is an analogy there but a little bit weaker one. big catch-all, falling into the high crimes, not defined in the constitution. abuse of power. looking at that we have to look at what the framers intent was. and they very specifically did not want the term maladministration in the constitution, meaning we don t like the job you re doing, you re doing a lousy job because they were afraid that would be used for very overtly political means. so the lesson from that
reporter: john, startling to see the escalation in tensions simply this morning as a result of these tweets really. the u.s. secretary of state quite clear who he thinks is to blame, but no evidence in those two simple social media messages. i should point out that the response went on to refer to how the maximum pressure campaign as the u.s. has been levying against iran has now turned to max deceit. he went on to say that the u.s. and its clients are stalking them because it will lead to military victory. he means how they re backing saudi arabia. but the big question, john, is about the facts and the evidence here. the houthis, the rebels have said they were behind this and they launched ten drones, but it s a long distance from their territory to the saudi facilities that have been quite remarkably damaged. the u.s. is briefing on back ground saying southern iraq is maybe where this was launched from. that might make more sense, but there are many analysts saying
know or like the president is always polite. she dares to call the idea of the u.s. buying land that is, again, not for sale, there wasn t a sign on it, absurd and suddenly she is nasty. somehow the star of the access tape feels comfortable levying that assault without any trace of irony or self-awareness. it was just lamst night that th president scrapped his trip to denmark. when it comes to great steaks, i ve just raised the stakes. the sharper image is one of my favorite stores, with fantastic products of all kinds. trump steaks are by far the
woman calls the idea of the u.s. buying land that is not for sale. there wasn t a sign on it. absurd. suddenly she is nasty. somehow the star of the access hollywood take feels comfortable levying that insult which he levied against hillary clinton and kamala harris. it was just last night the president scrapped his upcoming trip to denmark annoyed the danish government would not sign over a land mass three times the size of texas to a guy whose history includes bankrupt casinos, hidden tax machine and red meat sold at an electronics sale. when it comes to great stakes, i raised the stakes. sharper image is one of my favorite stores with fantastic products of all-time. trump steaks are the most flavorful and best tasting you have ever had. i showed you the trip before.
chinese sources tell us the directive in beijing is to decouple from reliance on the u.s. they refused to put back in any of the concession language they d deleted out of the trade deal, they also say they don t care about the election in 2020, they think trump is unreliable and feel the democrats would be just as bad it so china wants to pull away from reliance on the united states. it could be posturing. charles lane, opinion writer for the washington post, mollie hemingway sr. opinion writer at the federalist and we welcome back fox news contributor steve hayes after a year in spain with his family. what do you think? president trump is still in office and he is levying tariffs on china, what do you think? what we ve seen today in my view is why trade wars aren t good in the first place. the administration is right that the chinese didn t make good on their promises to buy more u.s.