Had displaced families unable to access really basically necessities they this to get a 0 Recovery Process that complutd included did necessities of placing them in temporary housing in addition to the be able responder and the businesses that gave food and shelter i want to recognize the group of Property Owners in the city the lavrd groups that stepped up to house our families you have 450e7 people like bert ive going on known for many years as head of paishd that of those there long, long before we thought of legislation to codify our work he was there and supervisor wiener when we first started the restoration that he k3b9d time and time again his willing innocence to set aside unit at park merced to houses u house the victims of fire i know the other disasters and in addition to park merced and other unit on Treasure Island stepped up to help famed by the 22nd aid 450id street fire and a newcomer to the area the technology to be living also residents and family from the mission fi
30 . Well take each item individually a resolution to denounce ind yania state [inaudible] coauthored by cruise, snideer and [inaudible] under the guides of religious freedom supervisor wiener thank you very much madam president. Anded a continuance given a change in indiana which is not puffificate. We wanted to work on amendments and distribute them to you. I want to make 2 small changes, one on page 3, line 12, the word directs a on the advise of city attorney, we change that to urges. Line 20 inserting the word a between passes and law. I would like to make a motion to make those amendments. Supervisor wiener made a motion to amendment the legislation z second by supervisor companys. Can we take those without objection. Those pass i understand these are not substant tv so it wont require continuance. The state attorney indicates that is correct. Colleagues what happened in indiana was really dispickable and frankly as horrible as it was it is a helpful reminder that with all the pr
Supportive of that. The question, the crux of this is the conditional use for certified legitimate practitioners. We have had a lot of discussion about that and there is a lot more discussion outside of this room with that and it sounds as though its intractable at this time that there is not going to be accommodation. We can object that here just go on the record to saying that we wish it would change, but again we are a recommending body. We dont do anything other than make a recommendation. If we want to make a recommendation we can go ahead and do that. Is there a commissioner that wants to propose a motion . And again, sort of with kind of an over arching and some specifics, i think it would be helpful to be on record to support supervisor tang because there was discussion at the Planning Department for the sole practitioner establishment to have it be just one but to support supervisor tang on the conditional use exemption for the sole practitioner with four and then also to supp
Public comment is closed. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . The motion carries. Is there any other new business from the commissioners. Seeing none the meeting is adjourned at. Well, thank you very much for coming and welcome to the appellant restaurant in the Downtown Center city college of San Francisco im the chair of culinary studies department youre in one of our classrooms one of four food service i89s from the studies department were a two year degreeed program that offers a degree in Culinary Arts Hospitality Management in addition the classroom youre in now is where the backing certificate is as well as our culinary arts certificate and some of the students to my left are part of the one Year Certificate Program a little bit about what we do were one of the programs in city college having been started by a graduate if the r from the Cornell School of hospitality we like to say what we do is over live experience to our students youre in a classroom that students offer food and
Meps were awarded late last year, weve been nesting the scope with them, making sure they understand what the scope is, we expect to get prices end of this month, early next month. If that doesnt work, we can turn around and bid them out in the august timeframe, were hoping to come to a conclusion with the existing bidders. Its a matter of we wont be able to execute the change orders until after the budget has been updated. What time of exclusion does that caoe create the total cost of the park, our estimate is 38 million dollars. The estimate for the landscaping package thats currently being advertised is 24. 5 million dollars. So, theres about i want to say 5 million dollars, theres probably more than that that were negotiating with them, but i dont want to tell them how much we want to pay for it. Is there a motion for approval . Move approval. We have a motion and a second. Is there any objection to the motion . Seeing none, it passes unanimously. And well note for the record that