plus, it works well.people fewer people die on the operating table when you do it that way.when you do it for generations. this is how american society ran. if you were smart and you worked hard, you could compete. i m pretty much equal footing against anyone else in america.. they tell you that was neverallh true, but it was true. it was called the american o dream. the re moved here from allver oe the world to partake in that system. but there was a political problem with it. if you ve gooutt a mérida kraddc society, it s pretty hard to play race politics because raced to plays no role in advancement. individual initiative is what matters. group interests are irrelevant in a meritocracy. now,group in that may sound idyc to you. it may sound like the kind of country you d want to live in, but for the democraticcrat party, it was a disaster.ic p get your voters to the polls if they re not racially aggrieved? it s harde of. so at the tail end of the civilo rights move
affirmative action in college admissions at harvard, specifically because they understand that their power depends on maintaining the racial spoil system they created. democrats are defendinge de the indefensible with maximum ferocity. unfortunately for them, it sm ts not that easy to do. i affirmative action is nots norm only the very definition of racism, it s also highly embarrassing in its particulars. the closer you get to it, the moreo it embarrassing it y is when you elevate people on the basis of their appearance. you tend not to get veryve impressive people. why would youpeople.? unless unless you re buying sunscreen, skin tone is a s totallyon irrelevant criterion. supreme court justice sonia sotomayor unwittingly made that point today. sotomayor openly concedes that she got her job because of affirmative action. she was completely and demonstrably unqualified for the position. obama chose her because of the way she looked. now, that may sound deranged,bu but it actually