was this the place to do it? the problem is where he s doing it, though. exactly. this is not the place that you do it. it s just basically decency. it has nothing to do with political correctness. it has to do with showing basic respect for people. why would you say something like that in front of people who are heroes. it s not decent of her wait. you may not think it s offensive, but we ve had native american people and native american groups and say that they think it s offensive. and that is all that matters. and i want to address what you just said about elizabeth warren, because she actually does not say what you re saying is true. she says this is what she was told by her family. there s no evidence whatsoever that she used it to get ahead she just said that in an interview with anderson. you repeat these talking points, but that s not actually what happened. and even if it did happen, it wouldn t justice his behavior. she had her name in that native american la
native american law directory she already had a job! she did not run into the event today and said, i m so happy to be here as a native american. she looks for any opportunity to fight with president trump but jason, there was an event one at a time. one at a time. there was an event today called by the president of the united states os tense apptensi thank the very brave navajo code talkers for their service. elizabeth warren was not there. she did not issue some statement endorsing the event based on her native american history. she had nothing to do with it. and he brought her and that offensive slur into the debate. she had nothing if she had put out a statement beforehand so it s okay for her to pretend that she s native american? first of all, she does not contend she pretended. and i believe her, but that s a red herring. it s a distraction. the president of the united states at an event where he simply should have said, thanks for your service, brought
staff. one reportedly works in brown s united states senate office. what are the grounds for firing in his office any way? brown says the chanting is certainly something i don t condone, but he doesn t stop there. he actually repeats the attack, which inspired his staffers in the first place. he says the real offense is that warren said she was white and then checked the box saying that she was native american. then she changed her profile in her law directory once she made her tenure. so brown doesn t want to talk about massachusetts economy, education or health care. he s fixated on elizabeth warren s racial heritage. in fact, he s launching this new attack ad. and race is the first thing talked about the in debate. warren claimed she was a native american, a person of color, and as you can see, she s not. i don t know, and neither do the
a boston television station says four of the people are member of scott brown s campaign staff. one reportedly works in brown s united states senate office. what are the grounds for firing in his office any way? brown says the chanting is certainly something i don t condone, but he doesn t stop there. he actually repeats the attack, which inspired his staffers in the first place. he says the real offense is that warren said she was white and then checked the box saying that she was native american. then she changed her profile in her law directory once she made her tenure. so brown doesn t want to talk about massachusetts economy, education or health care. he s fixated on elizabeth warren s racial heritage. in fact, he s launching this new attack ad. and race is the first thing
hems s white hands ad. he s really trying to channel white male anxiety and even resentment about minorities and women getting ahead because of affirmative action. you remember that ad. it showed white male hands crumpling a rejection letter and you deserved that job and you didn t get it because opponents supported affirmative action. but this is massachusetts ad. it s a swing state. i don t think it will work. i think it will backfire. but he s obviously really desperate. warren is appalled by the video but wouldn t go any further than that. the other thing is it s clear that senator brown is trying to set her up for being a liar, a character flaw, that she lied about her heritage on her application and when she got her tenure that she changed that in the law directory.