Its similar to 44bonview and this is needing upgrading immediately to the public attention. So pretty much the outcome is that if the rear view would be removed, hell have to be more of a financial burden and his family will be in shock pause theyll lose another bedroom. So, please thank you. Youll have more time in rebuttal. So well now hear from the Planning Department. Mr. Sanchez . Thank you. Subject property at 44bofview, located within the r. H. 1 Zoning District and the special use district. I believe that the district was added to the planning code in 1991. Under this district it requires a 35 rear yard and approximately 24. 5 feet for the subject property. And so the main issues here relate to the extension of the rear and the ground level retaining wall and grading issues as well as the deck on top of that structure which for lack of a better term could be described as supported on fourbyfour posts. The Planning Department does not have evidence that the defendant confirmed t
Imperial here. And johnson, here. We expect richards to be absent. First on the agenda is items for continues. Case 202052pca for the standard environmental conditions of approval, administrative and planning code amendments. Proposed for continuance to march 18, 2020. 2018, 11430, 1776 green street are proposed for indefinite knz. Items 3a and 2018 deny 282, 780 cancer street, continued to march 5. And case number 2018149, discretionary review is withdrawn. I have no speaker cards. President koppel anyone who wishes to comment on the items proposed for continuance . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner johnson move to continue items 1 through 4 as proposed. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On the motion, diamond aye. Fung aye. Imperial aye. Moore aye. Johnson aye. Koppel aye. So moved. That motion passes unanimously. Item 2b and 3b. I will continue to the date specified, thanks. Very good. That places us under item 5, adoption of draft minutes can february, 13, 2020. P
Shame and more than that harmful to lose that open space. Its understanding open green space and hard scaped. It has an impact again on how people con agre con gra gate ane space and the heat related increases as people are more and more concerned about global warming. And water run off. So again, were in favor of housing and keeping the grown gn space. Thank you. Supervisor yee next speaker. Good afternoon. My name is barbra brener. I am here as a neighbor of the 3333 california project. Im in favor of over turning the Planning Commissions approval of the Developers Plan as currently submitted. I speak in support of building 700 plus units on the site but with the strategy that is less didisruptive. Theres been a pattern of impropriety with the proposal before you. The site would have caused modifications in the design. In addition, flexible retail was never discussed nor was it mentioned in the Environmental Impact report so neighbors had no ability to consider it and respond. The e.
Insufficient or inadequate. They believe the circumstance eirs were not enough as well as a different project to be approved. Sequa requires study of a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives, promoting informed decisionmaking and public participation. Here, the eir presented circumstance alternatives including two full preservation and too preservation alternatives. Lhias position is that ten alternatives should have been study. This is unnecessary and not required by sers qua. Sequa. This contains the legally required reasonable range and provides ample information for analysis and consideration by you, the decision makers. And for an additional alternative not in the eir to be legally ar required, it must be different from those presented in the eir and must clearly lessen the projects significant impacts. On the last day of the Public Comment period, lhia submitted narratives and sketches for two projects and followed up with two more after the final er was published
Statement overriding sequa findings and that was not unanimous. The omission of an analysis in sequa is an emission so the measure analysis is legal issue. Its was incorrect any use of the design guidelines. Is that it . Yes. Ok, i want to say these pub pubc hearings for 22, 26 and 30 have been held and closed. We are now reconvened as the board of supervisors. We will take up the items related to the exemption from Environmental Review first and that would be items 23, 24 and 25 and we will be making an analysis of the adequacy, act accuracy and completeness of the environmental report, certified by the Planning Commission for the project at 3333 california street. Again, this requires six votes of the board of supervisors. Do we have a motion on items 23, 24 and 25 . Supervisor stephanie . Thank you, president yi. First of all, i would like to start by thanking everyone who came out today to give Public Comment. I do take these appeals very seriously. Here at the board of supervisors