release that manifesto of the transgender shooter. laura: we have been asking for that. they are hiding it. they are deeply related to a government that does not trust the people with the truths. if i m running and in charge that s what i m going to deliver. laura: sunshine as always the best disinfect tant. great to see you tonight. now back to timothy parlatore and brett tolman. another section of this indictment donald trump did divine, expire, known and unknown spirits. to dishonesty, fraud and deceit to impair fraud and deceit the government lawful function. how did any of that happen? what do we know at least from this indictment as have you read it that indicates any of that happened? yeah. can you put all kinds of whip
made an arrest in those cases. laura: in the hunter biden case, of course, the solicitation of bribery done with a wink and a nod, that s no problem. you can get away with that. but having a different opinion on election results that s a federal crime or four federal crimes. senator, thank you for joining us tonight. now barks back with our legal . the defendant had a right, like every american, to speak publicly about the election. even to claim falsely there had been an outcome determinative fraud during the election and that he had won. so, they concede that he had the right to have a different opinion. but, what? so they throw that in there to try to protect themselves, bret, but then they violate what they claim they are still protecting. yeah, laura, that s what they are doing, in fact, it was quite
[laughter] laura: senator, this is a speaking indictment. ooooh, this is like the same type of spin they tried after the devon archer testimony yesterday on a different topic though. yeah. and, well, on the topic of speaking, jack smith also spoke about this indictment. again, he sounded like one of those msnbc pundits. he didn t seem like a prosecutor who was pursuing criminal charges on well-established law but rather on novel legal theories that s not the way you should be pursuing not only a former president, laura. we have to remember that donald trump is also the leading candidate for the part opposition for the party in power now. this is taking us into third world banana republic territory when, again, have you novel legal theories totally untested by a prosecutor who has a history of ideological zealotry in pursuing these political cases and goats out and sounds
samantha powers, powers, connections to harvey weinstein and jeffrey epstein. this is quite the connection that we re drawing here it doesn t. shows jurisdiction and venue matters deeply. jack smith knows exactly what he is doing. laura it, strikes me as the truth of the matter here, they are not going to stop until they get him going or get him coming. say this as somebody who is running against trump. i m polling at third in the republican primary now it would be easier for me if donald trump were elim nateed from competition. that is not how any of us should want to win because that is bad for this country. that s why it s important for those of us con competing against trump to take a strong stand against these politicized indictments also why laura i m sharing this now earlier this
presidency, he was essentially handcuffed because he had everything going on with the mueller investigation. and it was all ultimately determined to be based on misinformation. i mean, this is an administration that had, you know, at some point tried to create this position within dhs of a minister of disinformation criminalize you for saying things that we disagree with. and senator cotton said it perfectly just a few minutes ago that you don t have to agree with whether a donald trump or giuliani said about election fraud to say that this is not something that should be within the purview of the department of justice. we don t put people in jail because we disagree with them. we put people in jail because they re dangerous. laura: well, putin does. yeah, putin does. xi does. i mean, they put people in jail all the time. they just disappear all