exactly help the prosecution in this case. and then as a court, he mentioned all these famous people and powerful people that he flew with. it didn t go further that that. it didn t name any dates or didn t name any specific incidents. why not? what s up with the prosecution? well, i think because what anyway need to do is find evidence or present evidence against maxwell. look, there is really no dispute that epstein did these crimes. the witness testified yesterday, it was clear she was abused in some way. what is not clear is how maxwell was in this case. the prosecution would know this day will come, why are they
chief justice roberts says he ll uphold the law without overturning roe. reporter: several of the courts conservatives willing to rule for the judge opponents. if we think the prior precedents are seriously wrong. why then does the history of this court s practice telling us the right answer of neutrality. reporter: in the supreme court did overturn roe, it would not ban it, it would leave it up to certain individual states. some already have bans that go into effect the moment re v. wade wasover turned.
had. and if you talk about redistricting. state after state, you talk about jury instruction and voting rights. it s all because democrats had just stopped really focusing on local race and state legislatures and they re paying a horrific price for it. and it accelerated during the obama administration. claire, you know we obviously we have hints as to where we think the court is going with this. i talked to a number of republicans and democrats about it. there are some strategists who recognize there are conservatives, they are nervous about this. this could become an an mating issue, ahead of next year s election if roe is overturned or gutted, that can motivate