this is all he had to say. how do you win this without trump? i m not doing anymore interviews. thanks, guys. thank you, david. for what it s worth, we had a robust conversation about immigration or need a labor workforce here in pennsylvania. that was some substance there. after that though, when trump s name came up, they had to go. so we got a lot to talk about here on the ground. joining me now is dasha burns who has been spending most of her time in this part of pennsylvania as part of our county to county midterm project. also with is the loel guru here. and we ll be joined by lisa sylvester from pittsburgh on the other side of the state. she s had the benefit of moderating both a republican and
California agricultural employers are in for a turbulent season as labor advocates and the farmworkers union are once again pushing to institute the infamous “card check” organizing system – which would make it far easier for workers to organize into unions – across the state. While the California legislature passed a bill last year which would have allowed union organizers to make an end-run around secret ballot elections, Governor Newsom ultimately returned AB 616 without signature. He noted “various inconsistencies and procedural issues related to the collection and review of ballot cards” and directed the Labor Workforce and Development Agency to work with the Agricultural Labor Relations Board and “all relevant stakeholders” to develop new polices to address the issue. This year, the United Farm Workers (UFW) is back at it again with AB 2183. What do you need to know about this second stab at a card check law, and what might
California agricultural employers are in for a turbulent season as labor advocates and the farmworkers union are once again pushing to institute the infamous “card check” organizing.
On February 7, 2022 a California Court of Appeal issued its decision in Hutcheson v. The Superior Court of Alameda County (UBS Financial Services, Inc.).
On February 7, 2022 a California Court of Appeal issued its decision in Hutcheson v. The Superior Court of Alameda County UBS Financial Services, Inc.. The case addresses the relation back doctrine in the context of a Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 lawsuit