drowned out, there is static out there, they would rather listen to adam schiff trying to connection the two, to push a quit prquit quit pro kuo, there is no quid pro quo in this phone call. you tell me, nothing of this sort came up, it was a consistent argument he made, they are corrupt, i don t want to just give them money, and where the hell are the europeans, is that correct. yeah. and you know, i listen to and rush, you know i am a fan. i have always known the bias in the media, what i really was really reinforced me is media in media is revealed more in what they don t report. they are not cleariu curious abe overt and really bias on what they do report. it really is, if they are not curious about something or nat reporting it, it is not a news
you don t need a quit pro kuo. i was going to ask about that. any of that, if a benign conversation, does that slow her wheel so ever? no. what is benign? if the president mentioned it, that is wildly inappropriate. yeah. he has effectively bartering without in so many words. i mean, the president is not dumb. he would, i think he would not say, well, i ll give you this if you give me that. you don t have to spell it out when talking to another leader. you re the president of the united states. you re telling somebody. you know? i think, we re worried about corruption in your country and i think you ought to investigate biden. you don t have to spell it out beyond that, is what the speaker is saying, and the third thing to me from adam schiff today is that reading between the lines, i might be wrong. might be able to read the lines, someone better than i it.
something they already knew about or was something that was public knowledge. what do you make of that denial? i read the washington post story very carefully. more than that i spent 16 years in the united states congress tracking all these things said about foreign policy. there is a high b.s. kuo sent going on here. we don t need to look for russia for affirmation. we need to ask questions why is this intelligence community trying to up end the president of the united states with these leaks? here is the post story. all over town people are saying the president did this and that. look, i disagree with president trump on a number of issues but on this one there can only be one president and somebody in the intelligence community is trying to up end this president in order to pursue a policy direction that puts us in conflict with russia. the question is, why? and who? and we need to find out. shannon: the president said again one of his tweets this morning was about the fact he
other things in your house connected to the internet. i guess some find that very exciting, but then the flip side, gosh, the way we re re relying on technology, now, kuo can t escape it. literally. it s great to think i can set my car to tell my house to turn on my air-conditioning when i m mile away. i can have my garage door open, but if it knows where you are, then so could potentially everyone else in the world. so, privacy issue. the privacy issue is huge. tv. android tv. how is it going to make watching tv that much more interesting. what is it going to do for us that our programming isn t doing? that s a valid point. we ve got your cable company has a set top box. google has google chrome that plugs into your tv and now, we have google tv. companies are kind of in a race here because somebody s got to
they would be perfectly happy if there was no grand bargain because they don t want to see social security, medicare or medicaid on the block. to some extent the republican dysfunction is allowing the status kuo to continue in a way that many on the left are happy with. as the congressman mentioned, the president is not a dictator. he s working with an intractable congress that has both in the senate and in the house done everything they can to set him up to fail. done everything to shoot, you know, his signature legislative accomplishment and then wonder why things are going wrong. we have to be focusing on is there a point in the future in which this congress will be less dysfunctional. the new york times said if they re going to run, if we get more republicans and more democrats in the house and fewer people holding congress hostage then we might see some of the legislative agenda go forward.