others, if there are stories to tell about others. they would want to know that first before considering immunity. so it s a case of michael flynn getting ahead of where this investigation is going. on the one hand trying to appear cooperative by offering to testify. and at the same time, using this legal tool that may be eventually at misdispo his did . we just don t know yet. but it causes those on the committee to say hold on, we re not yet. halle, what s been the white house response so far? so far, reaction from president trump, he tweeted about this right as the news was coming out on the early morning television talk shows. the president was essentially giving some backup to mike flynn, saying he should ask for immunity and that this is a witch hunt by media and dems by historic proportion. that s a different tune from what we heard from president trp on the campaign trail when it cam to hillary clinton and
it is interesting, regarding comey. until the campaign last year, the director of the fbi was not known as partisan lightning rod, served republican and democrat administrations. do you give him any benefit that his intentions were in the right place? i think he was trying to do the right thing. assume he was trying to do the right thing. i think where things went ape little bit off, was the fact that he broke protocol when it cam to sequest came to secretary clinton. there are rules in place you are not supposed to talk about a candidate or election during a certain period during the election. he chose to break that, but now we are seeing all kind of information come out, that he had on now president trump. but then again, let s just get this entire issue of russia out of the political space. and with some independent people who can objectively tell us what happened. do have to ask. do you have confidence in the director s ability to oversee an investigation. i think the argum
randi joins me now. the hypocrisy is just beyond. beyond imagination. what about his wife in all of this? she hasn t said a word. which is sort of surprising, anderson. back in may when it cam out he molested his sisters when he was 15 years old she came out with a statement, supporting him. he had gone down the wrong path. gotten counseling and treatment he needed to. day complete silence from her. i am sure it is very difficult. they have four children. just had a baby girl in july. they posted pictures of the baby on facebook. now the comments instead of saying congratulations on facebook, they say, anna, you should leave him. get rid of him. he cheated on you. don t have to stay with him. a scum mradifferent story than y expected. feel terrible for her and the kids. evocateur: the morton downey jr. movie airs after this program on cnn. we ll have a preview and, why downey cast a shadow on political discourse that continues to this day. at ally bank no branches equal
then it s a complete disaster for them. that guy gets fired and disappeared. they replace him with a new guy who says, yeah, we think it will be relatively easy. and they have a containment system so in cases of blowout by the way, 57% chance they admit that if they continue 75% chance that there will be a blowout. so they tested their capping stack in 2012, it cam out looking like a crumpled can. they tested it again, refused to release the results. given complaints like that, was it a surprise that the obama administration said go ahead? they ve been expressing concerns about climate change all along but they have it seems like they ve been enthusiastic about this work going forward. the obama white house must have been disappointed to see the way the calendar was colliding here because obama earlier this month, big climate change speech, strongest action any administration has ever taken and then somebody must have whispered in his ear and said
they want to get it started so they can work next spring. that s what they wanted to do in 2012 as well and it went horribly wrong. relatively easy. can we come up with the things that can be harder than the arctic? so this guy in 2012 says it will be relatively easy. then it s a complete disaster for them. that guy gets fired and disappeared. they replace him with a new guy who says, yeah, we think it will be relatively easy. and they have a containment system so in cases of blowout by the way, 57% chance they admit that if they continue 75% chance that there will be a blowout. so they tested their capping stack in 2012, it cam out looking like a crumpled can. they tested it again, refused to release the results. given complaints like that, was it a surprise that the obama administration said go ahead? they ve been expressing concerns about climate change all along but they have it seems like they ve been enthusiastic about this work going forward. ?