Less means to do do renovations on their homes to do them in this case, i building this landmark district is in pretty Good Condition and the buildings there are worth 1. 7 million we the people are actually owning those buildings can actually do the renovation without the tax break ill rather we didnt unable to to happen ill be voting against the miles act on those 3 items. Supervisor wiener. Thank you, mr. President i appreciate supervisor avalos remarks but i disagree first of all, its an initial matter colleagues this particular area wasnt 25 or 20 years ago, it was a very challenged neighborhood until recently it was a point challenge due to the incredible work of the residents of that area this has been a drastically improved area the residents of that area deserve a lot of credit we shouldnt reward them but no longer going to give me miles act contracts i want to note that the miles act is not just for obligated properties but to give homeowners an incentive you can do work on H
and the others are not laid out there. you have six departments which altogether are asking for $600,000 in other outgo with the specification of what that money can or will be used for. it is referred to as a parking lot and other times as a slush fund. you have $1.30 million for support for dream schools. they were the product of the consent decree and the consent decree is gone. if you want the additional hour after the teachers work day, there needs to be some consultation with the union over adding that two peoples day. there has not been that consultation. we note with concern that despite the flawed reporting in the papers, central office has grown by 4.29%. and the human resources cut that was recorded in the paper as being 30% is actually 0.9 of one position and not the 30% that was quoted in the paper. there are things in here with that we would expect you to address. those other outgoes, the d.r.e.a.m. schools. we want with some clarity what is going on. good e
there was a little bit of discussion on tuesday as in some ways a place where that money has not been allocated yet. i believe the process by which the decisions are made to allocate those funds are made through a collaborative. a number of people i am looking at dr. blanco. it is a process that has been in place for several years by which people, a staff that are involved in the work that is done that is reimbursable by medical and the work to document reimbursable services are claimed and who have made decisions about what the highest priorities are for the use of those funds. that is done through a collaborative effort. it is literally called the lea collaborative. that body has not at least completed its deliberations about how to allocate those funds. that is a process issue. that is the reason why it has not shown up in a different way through positions. i am trying to make a point which is that it is hard for the board to pass a budget when there is 900 tricky mill
services for poor kids in school, yes. our job is to make them make the right choice. as hard as we try, we have not done a good enough job or we have to admit we failed and say to my kids are the lowest priority. the lowest priority of the state, not the highest. we need to change. people need to engage in this and they need to know what is going on. this is so veiled and difficult. i am urging that we in our school district tried to make this as clear as possible which is tough. and find ways with our partners and others to get this message out and to say, this is not ok with us and not ok with us that this is being apparently championed by our friends and representatives. please, i want us to work on that and asked the staff to help us with that. i want to say something i said last week and i will try to make it short. i think we need an entirely different discussion about flexing money. i do not want to again and i will keep saying this. if the staff keeps saying, that is