matters. what does appearance have to do with ability or fealty to the constitution? he indicated to be fair he a lawyer, but wanted a black woman. how how do genes determine your ability as a supreme court justice, airline pilot, or anything else? we d like to hear joe biden explain that. but he didn t. he embarked on a particularly short nationwide search and located in the end a person named ketani brown jackson not about what she s done what she thinks but instead about how she looks. it s not shallow or anything. here is the shallowest of all. i could not be joyous you were sitting in my office and i
solely nominated due to your race and not for other factors. apparently some have complained that you need to show your lsat scores to determine whether you are a top legal mind. this is incredibly offensive and condescending. tucker: it s repugnant! incredibly offensive! she s a top legal mind! shut up, you aren t allowed to ask for proof. you ve got mazie hirono, the senate s dumbest member, don t you to ask for her test scores. we know what they are. she s incurious to know that judge jackson was nominated because of race and after joe biden bragged repeatedly that judge jackson was for her race and sex. they are apoplectic if you dare to repeat what they say. once the message? you aren t allowed to talk to
hmm. why is it unconstitutional? she didn t explain. is that a sound legal argument? why is judge jackson so fixated on defending sexual predators? what does the fbi think about that. this show, just obtained an email to the fbi los angeles woman the back affairs committee, a group within the fbi. this was sent out to every fbi agent in the field office on march 11th, this month. it is an invitation to a nomination party for ketanji brown jackson. join us for lots of celebration, that the in an fbi conference room. chris dickens johnson, the assistant director in charge of the l.a. field office, is the featured speaker. this is a nominee! this is somebody who doesn t have a job whose nomination is by definition a political question who the senate votes
about all the inside jokes, what does this line me, what does that line mean? it was unbelievable that he had a calendar as detailed as it did, detailing over the summer and his life. i don t see how anybody can complain about any question relating to ketanji brown jackson based on the standard that they put in place for brett kavanaugh. in particular, i want to go to the josh hawley data you cited, the opinion he was quizzing her on for this was when she was a judge, effectively what she argued in response to senator hawley, child pornography laws are too strict for offenders, as long as everybody is suggesting they should have had in the 1980s and 1990s. this is her reason to lead legal
him no more insolence, serve! thankfully , in the hearings today, a few senators did ask relative questions be here is josh hawley. this is a child case for the defendant this routed multiple images of child porn, the federal guidelines recommend a sentence to 121 months in prison. prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison. judge jackson gave the defendant three months in prison. tucker: hm! that s pretty serious. why did she do that, judge jackson question mike here s the response. the guideline was based originally on a statutory scheme and on directives, specific directives by congress at a time in which more serious child