Lonely voice you know how it is in the house if you believe in balance budget or you believe we should spend less or have a limited Constitutional Government really you know, controversial thing unfortunately we never get any of the other side but then we lose a lot on our side that could be better at it and i guess thats one of my frustrations but i try very hard to have the same opinion whether it is republican president or democrat president that, you know, constitution was specific. Spending power was ours things like that that we should keep our plans on and i think we too easily give that up and i think one of the interesting things that i found coming up here is that democrats are better on these issues when it is republican president they want to oppose republicans are better on this when it is democratic. But when the partieses are the same they tend to sort of ac acquiesce a little bit on separation of powers and many this book you write the case against socialism it operates
The case against socialism is your book but first lets talk about the role that you have within congress, as an independent voice and someone willing to strike out on issues some are not willing to strike out on. Sometimes im lonely if you believe in balance budgets or spend less with a limited Constitutional Government that is controversial. Unfortunately we lose a lot on our side that we could be better and thats one of the frustrations i try hard whether republican or democratic president the constitution is specific spending power is hours the power to declare war. I think too easily we give that up in one of the things i found coming up here is that when its a republican president or democratic presidency opposite but the parties are the same they acquiesce on the separation of powers. In this book you write it operates to me very much as a debate guide against those who try to grow the left Political Movement by advancing socialist dictators so talk about the need for the book th
Work with you here in the congress. Eager to chat about your book, the case against socialism but maybe first reflect a little bit on the role that you have within the congress and within our party as an independent voice and as someone whos willing to strike out on issues that may be other republicans arent whirling to strike out on. Guest sometimes i think im a lonely voice but you know how it is in a house if you believed in balancedbudget or you believe we should spend less or have a limited Constitutional Government really controversial things like that, limited Constitutional Government but unfortunately we never get any of the other side but then we lose a lot on our side that could be better at it and i guess thats one of my frustrations but i tried very hard to have the same opinion whether republican president or democrat president that the constitution was specific. Spending power was ours but things like that that we should keep our hands on from a power to declare war is o
Unfortunately we never get the other side but we lose a lot on our side. I guess that is one of our frustrations that i try very hard to have the same opinion whether as a republican or democrat president and the constitution specific spending power was ours. Things like that we should keep her hands on to declare war is ours. And i think we too easily give that up in one of the interesting things that i found coming appear, democrats are better on these issues when its republican president because we both go can i do o and when the parties are the same they acquiesced over the bit on separation of powers. In this book you write the case against socialism which operates very much as a debate guide against those who would grow the left by advancing socialist ideas and embracing socialist dictators. Talk about the need for the book through the lens of which Political Movement is expanding or contracting. Most people look at the title and say thats a great idea but we wish it was not nece
An independent voice and is someone willing to strike out on issues that may be other opinions are not willing to strike out on. Guest sometimes i think im a lonely voice. If you believe in balanced budget or believe we should spend less or have a limited Constitutional Government really controversial things like that, limited Constitutional Government, unfortunately we never get the other side but then we lose a lot on our side that are better at it. That is one of my frustrations and i tried very hard to have the same opinion whether republican or democrat president that that constitution was specific. Spending power was ours. Things we should keep our hands on and the power to declare war is ours and i think we too easily give that up in one interesting thing that i found can appear is that democrats are better when its a revolving in president and democrats but when the parties are the same they tend to acquiesce a little bit on the idea of separation of powers. Host in this book y