high visibility attack. and what it does is it s being talked about in kabul. what the intent was was to juneo uner mine the governments ability to provide security. the fact is that a bunch of provincial gofers and on thers from the central government were getting together to talk about the thanoff of security responsibility from coalition forces to afghan national forces. so this was certainly very symbolic. it wasn t it wasn t nearly as successful as mumbai. but they are looking for something like tet in 1968 in vietnam that undermines the confidence in the central government. gretchen: is the timing ironic? last week president obama went
debt-free, happy and competitive in economic trade. i have been to china more than the candidates put together. i have seen the competition, we better get off our you know whats and go to work. if you were to look at the opposition you would face in a gop primary, the power and the amount of money, for instance, with the coke brothers who are happy to spend unlimited amounts of money in secret in undisclosed vehicles to annihilate people like you that might threaten them. there are countless, quiet and secret money kabuls exploding citizens united in all the rest of it, the whole money culture in politics, to destroy anyone who begins to talk the way that you do. it is a battle worth having. look, i have been beaten before. i ve been beaten by the big money interest. i ran against edwin edwards, governor of louisiana 20 years ago, he used to brag on 60 minutes that he would take money from people who wanted