Very clear in smiley and in hillenbrand that were defining legislature in this clause as meaning legislative process. With all due respect i disagree. This court heard the argument in the briefs in smiley, and one side was saying just that. One side was saying Legislature Just means the legislative process in the state, whatever that is. The other side said no, it means the representative body of the people. And this court said, well, actually we dont have to decide that dispute but we certainly agreed that it means the representative body of the people just as we said five years earlier in the hawk case. So what the court says is first the delegee is clearly the legislature. The representative body of the people. But that brings you then to the second question, which is what kind of authority is delegated to the state legislatures . And the authority thats granted under the elections clause is a lawmaking authority so, that means that the state legislature has tone gauge in lawmaking
West virginia said one officer was hurt by shattered glass inside the courthouse during wednesdays shootings but no other injury was reported. The gunman was in a parking lot across the courthouse downtown and they have yet to determine the motive. You see the aerial shot live from wheeling, west virginia. This is the block where that activity took place. And again there are a number of different reports saying that at the very least the shooter is down and critically injured. More news on al jazeera. It is a hobby, something that i wanted to do part time. Thats partly why i enjoy it so much. Shawn mccutcheons part time hockey is changing the rules o rules. Thats tonight on inside story. Hello, the Supreme Court is back in session this week, and the first case it heard involved cash and campaigns. Shawn mccutcheons was to contribute more money to candidates. Three years ago the Supreme Court opened the floodgates for corporate and union money to super pacs, but current law sets the amo
Is a look at a small slice of that, not full picture and so far it doesnt look like a catastrophic issue. The one to take on the second part of the . I agree with our questioner, whichever scenario look at, it usually comes out as the biggest potential contributor addressing Global Change concerns. Thats true whether its a developer or developing world. One of the sort of, the dilemmas are often struck ask lowhanging fruit. Suppose would these measures are, we would all be financially better off. Why doesnt it happen in practice . I think thats the big conundrum that we face. I think theres a number of different aspects your one this has been mentioned by howard which is pricing. Theres two sides to the. One is subsidized fossil fuels and the other have some kind of extra now the price is to convey the truth level cost of carbon. The other is pollution. The higher the return. I think the other issue is standards. We could be much more aggressive in requiring standards for efficient bui
All High School Juniors and children in the gallery and state legislatures a. Some of those elements we think are not ones that the court should acknowledge is whether or not it advances religion. If you ask a chaplain for the state assembly i and sacrament f california who is going to the assembly are you going to advance your religion today . What this court said is the limit of the legislative prayer is a problem ties to example. We think with respect to the Second Circuit if got it just about right to the question is does it preach conversion or threaten and damnation to non believers or you use the word advanced and proselytized. Its not proselytized or advanced. That is the link which is the proselytized and whether or not it is in fact fair to ask the minister or the priest or the chaplain if he or she advances their religion. We dont whitmarsh says is advanced doesnt mean having a single chaplain of a denomination were looking at the content of the sectarian prayer in light of
Is that entire issue being determined in those proceedings . Not determined because the proceedings have been stayed. But three states have challenged that issue is what is at issue there . Will you finish describing the issue . I really didnt hear it. K 466 says a correction must be made in the same manner, end quote, as decision being corrected. Epas approval went through notice and comment and because of that k6 requires they go through notice and comment and corrections here did not go through notice and comment. Heres no disagreement between commissioners and respondants on that point. The United States tries to get out of that by saying they can use the good cause exception in rule making that sounded the administrator procedure act. That doesnt help epa at all because the requirement comes not from the administrative procedure act. The requirement from notice to use comments is from k6. It doesnt help epa rely on an exception to a statute when the statute does not impose the req