For that kind of a system, or you price the cost of it into it. But if everything is at price and you are building an inefficient mechanism, there are two problems. One, that will come back in the price. And two, it is random. Because if you think of people similarly situated and similarly injured in that system, somebody thinks about going to a lawyer, another person doesnt think about going to a lawyer, you dont have social justice. It has kind of an administration, everybody is entitled and it is relatively easy. A lot of people fear the court. They dont want to waste their time. So that system is, in some way, a crapshoot. It is random. And i would say the greatest advantage of the jury system is the interim of fact. Everybody is scared of the jury and that is why you can settled more settle more cases. Having a big fear factor is not you keep messing around, you might have a nuclear holocaust. I think the jury trial, and maybe some of the myths around it, lead to that kind of beha
There is Common Ground in this state that the u. S. Constitution does not directly address samesex marriage which means to turn to the question substantive due process. The right being asserted is objectively deeply rooted in this nations history and tradition and puts it in the concept of the words liberty, such that you can conceive of liberty and justice about it. Samesex marriage doesnt have the deep root. What do you do about the fact that one could have said the same thing about lawrence . Well, with respect to lawrence, the Lawrence Court didnt directly address that analysis. This court has repeatedly applied the analysis and recognizes the continuing way that youre supposed to analyze due process both in the u. S. Citizen Association Case and lawrence, this court has continued to apply glovesburg has recognized as that as the relevant standard. Lawrence doesnt override or reverse all of the cases before it simply by not mentioning it. So this court is still bound about it and b
An emerging recognition that some laws to discriminate against the marginalized, the in this case, the most vulnerable members of our society. We know better now. There is no reason to treat people this way. We ask that you affirm. Stanyar. Ou ms. Just a few quick points, your honor. Our society has a mechanism for change. That is the amendment process. Due process is not a mechanism for change, it is a mechanism for preserving things that are deeply rooted in history. Theres the amendment process that is available at the federal and state level. That is for example, there are six things on the ballot in 2012 through the initiative process. There are six different measures. That goes to the point that there is a state that is conferred. Repeatedly, in discussing the dignity better than conferred, talks about being a dignity conferred by the state and that goes back to the point about democracy. The people confer that dignity by voting for it hurts the right process, if theres going to
The Committee on Judicial Conduct will decide whether Justice Catherine Connors violated the ethics code in a process that has little public oversight.
The Committee on Judicial Conduct will decide whether Justice Catherine Connors violated the ethics code in a process that has little public oversight.