Again given that this is on a puc its my understanding under the rules that are in place this would not require a permit. Quick question. Do you have verizon or at t . I wish i had verizon during the Power Outages because it sounds like it was working better. [laughter] thank you. We are now moving onto Public Comment. How many people are here for Public Comment . If you could line up against the wall so we can keep the process moving i would appreciate it. Everyone has two minutes each. First speaker, please come up. First speaker. Thank you. Im liz buchanan. I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public Health. One great solution is to set a maximum effective radiated power limit from the face of the antenna shroud at 40mili watts by adding the article to article 25. For Wireless Telecommunications facility that is installed in the public rightsof
As i read this, thats what these words mean. I agree. Might want to go back and talk to whoever at public works drafted it. I agree. Its in the ordinance . Yeah, i mean so. Anyway. Probably none of that matters. The ordinance is different. So why is the language different between these two things brad, our City Attorney . I cant say why its different but there is an ordinance that has the same restriction its just worded differently. It says the prohicks set forth in section 4 shall on prohibition set forth in section 4 shall only apply if it has. Its hard to hear you. The code provides weve been looking at the order on mobile food facilities which is very similar to the code. The code provides the prohibition set forth in subsection 4 which is a 75set radius provision shall only apply if a restaurant has direct street access to its primary access. Very similar. The problem is the ordinance doesnt make sense. A restaurant cant have street access to its own entrance. What it means is do
To us. But that is their choice. Often Neighborhood Associations have specific chairs or subgroups that deal with land use. They want the thousands of notices that we send out every year, not everybody else. With that, im available for questions. Again given that this is on a puc its my understanding under the rules that are in place this would not require a permit. Quick question. Do you have verizon or at t . I wish i had verizon during the Power Outages because it sounds like it was working better. [laughter] thank you. We are now moving onto Public Comment. How many people are here for Public Comment . If you could line up against the wall so we can keep the process moving i would appreciate it. Everyone has two minutes each. First speaker, please come up. First speaker. Thank you. Im liz buchanan. I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public H
And if that entrance is more than doesnt have direct street access then this doesnt apply. Does that make sense . So you know the big double doors at Cheesecake Factory thats the primary entrance. Doesnt have direct street access so it doesnt apply. As i read this, thats what these words mean. I agree. Might want to go back and talk to whoever at public works drafted it. I agree. Its in the ordinance . Yeah, i mean so. Anyway. Probably none of that matters. The ordinance is different. So why is the language different between these two things brad, our City Attorney . I cant say why its different but there is an ordinance that has the same restriction its just worded differently. It says the prohicks set forth in section 4 shall on prohibition set forth in section 4 shall only apply if it has. Its hard to hear you. The code provides weve been looking at the order on mobile food facilities which is very similar to the code. The code provides the prohibition set forth in subsection 4 whic
I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public Health. One great solution is to set a maximum effective radiated power limit from the face of the antenna shroud at 40mili watts by adding the article to article 25. For Wireless Telecommunications facility that is installed in the public rightsofway or attached to any building or antennas installed at heights lower than 100 feet off the ground, the applicant must install only antennas radios and other supporting equipment that have no chance of exceeding the total of 40 milliwatts of effective radiated power from all the equipment operating at or connected to the specific wtf Wireless Telecommunications facility. 40 watts provides four main benefits. It provides coverage for Telecommunication Service for about onehalf mile from the source antenna. Two, does not effectively prohibit Telecommunication Se