it s not. that information that facebook released today touched on a lot of issues that congress is in. there s opt out features and things built in that allows this for help for those with a nefarious intend could do so. that s the kind of thing that our legislatures are going to focus on frankly. how can we prevent this from happening again. how can this not be the norm so the loop holes that people can squeeze through won t happen again? this is merely the beginning. note the senate judiciary community has issued invitations to ceos of google andpple. there s a lot of questions that the plito. neil: this started with mark zuckerberg saying there s some regulation in order here. be careful what you wish for. don t you think it s possible
no maer your status you re not immune when you have an issue coming up like this. and second the judiciary community can t be impervious itself. so chief justice roberts wanted to order this review so they could still stand as a body with integrity if they are supposed to be the lead court of the nation and to be weighing what is right and wrong, he wants to make sure they have an outlet. people who are working in the judiciary have an outlet to bring the claims forward. a lot of these claims with judge kosinski dayed back years. in this case, he wanted to be sure there is a proper outlet and there could be changes as a result of this review. let me read from the report. the judiciary will begin 2018 but undertaking a careful evaluation whether its standards of conduct and procedures for investigating and correcting and appropriate behavior are adequate to insure an exemplary workplace for every judge and
it will be very interesting to see who hired they will. i think it can be public here. it is the firm that hired steele to start looking into this through only significance research, for primary points and then it passed people want it to win. he talked to the judiciary community for nine hours, okay? mr. simpson testified today before the senate judiciary committee. he sat for over nine hours of questions before the judiciary committee staff. he answered dozen if not hundreds of questions. so what is clear to me based on that is, whatever is happening, whatever they re
individual will be a champion of constitutional rights and liberties and will be able to stand up to donald trump soon to be president and say, you cannot do what you need to do, or we re going to have to indict someone who is a friend of yours, and sometimes there will be conflicts of interest where an independent counsel will have to be appointed. that s why we say the gavel really falls on the pieces of the new administration. starting tomorrow morning, senator richard blumenthal of the senate judiciary community. thank you for joining us tonight from washington where we understand the senate remains in session. now to washington with the capitol in the background. she is the veteran of the cruz campaign. that s what brought her to our studio last, but these days she is a spokesperson for attorney general designate jeff sessions.
that s why we say the gavel really falls on the pieces of the new administration. starting tomorrow morning, senator richard blumenthal of the senate judiciary community. thank you for joining us tonight from washington where we understand the senate remains in session. now to washington with the capitol in the background. she is the veteran of the cruz campaign. that s what brought her to our studio last, but these days she is a spokesperson for attorney general designate jeff sessions. sara, nice to see you again. there is a bit of reporting from the washington post that points out senator sessions, the would-be attorney general sessions, because of votes he cast in the senate had already been cast, done and dusted, finds himself on the wrong side of standing laws like same-sex marriage, hate crimes act, violence against women act, to name three. given those three, his new job would be as chief law