Ted cruz with a significant lead in two state caucuses. Result in a this thirdparty candidacy . That is our focus on the sunday morning. We welcome your calls and emails and tweets whether or not there could be a Viable Third Party candidacy. 2027488000 is a line for democrats. Is a line from republicans 2027488002. Independents. M nixonthe 1960s, richard ,his is from political magazine sorry conservatives, it is likely to late for a Viable Third Party candidate. Donald trump is one step closer to clinton in public in and plenty of gop figures are horrified. On thursday, leaders meeting in washington to plot a thirdparty run against the front runner, says it will be a true conservative in the race. Night,n Late Wednesday talking about the possibility speculated if republicans kids stop party could stop donald trump by organizing a third party. Unless theres as financial times, donald trump won republican elders. Open. One lines are 2027488000 is our line for democrats. 2027488001 is ou
Government spending is something that does not guilty gel with real life. In other words all of these government expenditures in some of the graphs that we show today are because were not taking their money so therefore, that e kwatquates to Government Spending where in real life does not taking somebodys money equate to spending again, the credible credibility gap, i think increases when statements like that are made. By the way, if thats the case, i think that what . Our gdp is what . 17 trillion . What we take in revenue and taxes is about roughly about 3 trillion. Ballpark figures. So, in essence, that means that were spending 14 trillion because thats money that the government is not taking from the economy. So should we then call that 14 trillion in Government Spending . No. Thats ludicrous. And its ludicrous to say that money that we are not forcefully taking because people dont pay this willingly, theyre forced to pay is somehow Government Spending. Credibility gap. When one sa
Peoples opinion. They have their own experiences with this economy good or bad, and i suggest you stop digging once youre in a hole of that size. My question of you is how much business taxes are included in this budget. So what our budget does on taxes we propose a fully paid for set of middle class tax cuts that is paid for in the way that i discussed before. With business tax increases . Actually i want doesnt include any business tax increases. What are the taxes . I notice youre planning a massive increase for Capital Gains tax, nearly doubling the Capital Gains tax rate from the beginning of thiS Administration. All were doing is proposing to take it back to what it was under reagan. Are you proposing to take the income tax rate back down to where it was under reagan . We are propose inging a comprehensive, revenueneutral business tax reform. Were proposing to fully offset the tax cuts for 44 million middle class families average 600 drars ewith the Capital Gains tax. Heres the p
And Childrens Hospital in philadelphia and saint johns, and i was hoping for a commit beyond the 100 million and i think we are getting Great Results and i will submit a question on that and now that im out of time as well as the treatment of foster care for giving foster parents a specialized training they need to take care of kids that have particular challenges but ill do that by way of a written question. But thank for your testimony and for being here and for your service. Thank you, senator. Thank you mr. Chairman and thank you madam secretary for your service. I would like to in a very short period of time see if we can cover four topics. New jersey and protection and number three autism coverage and number four the midnight rule. So let me first of all, before we go to that, i want to highlight key components of the president s budget proposeal that i believe are critical and important for the in my view the most important part of the population and that is the children and the
I think we need to do both and can do more in the way of securing fiscal materials and the wherewithal with Nuclear Weapons and also biological weapons around the world. And i also believe that the United States needs a safe, secure and reliable nuclear deterrent, because as much as we would like to see Nuclear Weapons and other weapons of mass destruction rid from the earth, that doesnt look like its something thats going to happen soon and its important that the american deterrent that we provide to our own country, but also to friends and allies who rely upon him is safe, secure and reliable. I think we need to do both and can do both. You wrote an article last year for Foreign Affairs and you talked about two lessons from iraq and afghanistan. First, that the pentagon was not prepared to fight a nontraditional enemy and, second, that the length of those wars was underestimated. There was little incentive to pursue acquisitions tailored to the specific fights. Can you talk about how