Name on it as the author so we can vote when we explorer the idea of looking at people that receive a tacks break from the city i think that creating that relationship they have voluntarily apply for the tax break we can ask them how theyre doing in making sure that women are being paid equally for the same work that men do i ask a motion to duplicate the file and, of course, the one that remains here move forward. Is there a second second by supervisor campos colleagues, any discussion on that to duplicate . Okay. Well maam, okay. On the motion to duplicate and send back to Committee Discussions supervisor campos. Thank you let me say this is i think its really important we take a vote on the ordinance as proposed today and as i understand the motion by supervisor avalos well be able to do that and the reason why i seconded the motion i think that as the current version of the legislation moves forward it is appropriate for us in committee to discuss whether or not we should add to th
For making the implementation dates until january 2016 and, of course, for continuing the item for the three weeks to look at the legislation so i thank you for that i do have a conversation with the Supervisors Office today and i know youre not a psychic but i brought up things that youve disregard with so today, i was prepared to speak to how the searchandseizure board i want them to address the threshold amount which dcwf has brought to me and others i understand that you couldnt have foreseen i would propose this amendment but during this review process theyll seriously consider the nonprofit do grantees ive mentioned at our last meeting prior to the continuance to make sure that the sires body to spell out how their collecting data that some of our nonprofits or contractors are submitting already to our various City Department and repurpose them in a way not to be bumping how it is youre going to analyze the data and how it is were going to be catering this legislation it is one i
That to apply the final points my understanding supervisor tang st. Is going to release a couple of amendment to the board of supervisors i think there is nothing in this motion this ordinance that precludes that from happening but a need for clarity im happy to do that but the Second Amendment as i understand an amendment to increase the threshold from 50,000 to 100,000 for entities that receive city grants im going to speak against that amendment for a number of reasons one because i believe that we have yet to fully understand the indications were talking about few institutions that will be covered by this ordinance and doubling the threshold would have severe impacts in terms of who is covered by this requirement the second point i think if we have to respect the process thats been followed well have legislation that was introduced several weeks ago we had a hearing at the commission on the status of women no amendments were offered at any of the meetings my understanding is the im
To ask i respectfully ask for your support. Thank you supervisor tang. Thank you first of all, i want to thank supervisor campos for making the implementation dates until january 2016 and, of course, for continuing the item for the three weeks to look at the legislation so i thank you for that i do have a conversation with the Supervisors Office today and i know youre not a psychic but i brought up things that youve disregard with so today, i was prepared to speak to how the searchandseizure board i want them to address the threshold amount which dcwf has brought to me and others i understand that you couldnt have foreseen i would propose this amendment but during this review process theyll seriously consider the nonprofit do grantees ive mentioned at our last meeting prior to the continuance to make sure that the sires body to spell out how their collecting data that some of our nonprofits or contractors are submitting already to our various City Department and repurpose them in a way
Of the parties involved to work best method to implement this law were talking about this law not being implemented until january 1st, 2016, thats a long period of time for us to figure out the best method to collect data at the end of the day the basic thrust of this legislation is simply collect data to require the reports be for the city thats not too much to ask i respectfully ask for your support. Thank you supervisor tang. Thank you first of all, i want to thank supervisor campos for making the implementation dates until january 2016 and, of course, for continuing the item for the three weeks to look at the legislation so i thank you for that i do have a conversation with the Supervisors Office today and i know youre not a psychic but i brought up things that youve disregard with so today, i was prepared to speak to how the searchandseizure board i want them to address the threshold amount which dcwf has brought to me and others i understand that you couldnt have foreseen i would