that the prosecutors knew exactly who john raupaugh was. the state basically hid him from us. and then the attorneys told the judge what they discovered about the pro cougs cougs s conduct. they had him bring the jacket and the hat and they had taken it from him, and they had put it in one the trunk of one of the detective s cars, and returned it to him after the trial. fr and that is the type of evidence that could have tilted the evidence in his original trial. and we were plain mad at that case. you get mad enough you go another way. we had sat there in the courtroom to thinking that he had been guilty to not sure that the jury will not find him guilty, to then they will find
kept it from the prosecution for maximum impact. the back doors burst open. defense called john rupauh. and at 3:30 in the morning, you couldn t help but think, could that have been who cone saw walking down the road? this is another tall white guy blond walking down the street, and it is effective. the walker gave that jury a reason to have reasonable doubt. it gave them a reason to say it s not tim. when the walker took the stand, richardson asked what he wore on the nightly walks down sommer hill road. he wore a beanie hat, and he had a members only jacket. black members only jacket. after the walker s testimony, the defense moved to have the case thrown out. the defense accused the prosecution of outright cheating, because it turned out that the prosecutors knew exactly who john raupaugh was.
cheating, because it turned out that the prosecutors knew exactly who john raupaugh was. and then the attorneys told the judge what they discovered about the prosecutor. they had him bring the jacket and the hat and they had taken it from him, and they had put it in one the trunk of one of the detective s trunk, and returned it to him after the trial. and that is the type of evidence that could have tilted the evidence in his original trial. and we were plain mad at that case. you get mad enough you go another way. we had sat there in the courtroom to thinking that he had been guilty to not sure that the jury will not find him guilty, to then they will find him guilty, to not. and then after three hours
and at 3:30 in the morning, you wonder if that is who patrick cone saw on the road. this is another tall white guy blond walking down the street, and it is effective. it is one of those magical moments in the courtroom, and the walker gave that jury a reason to have reasonable doubt. it gave them a reason to say it was not tim. when the walker took the stand, richardson asked what he wore on the nightly walks down sommer hill road. he wore a beanie hat, and he had a members only jacket. black members only jacket. after the walker s testimony, the defense moved to have the case thrown out. the defense accused the prosecution of outright cheating, because it turned out that the prosecutors knew exactly who john raupaugh was. and then the attorneys told