Appealable to this board and i think that is a correct call. I think that i agree and i dont see anything in the charter that will give us jurisdiction over this determination and nothing under a 309, 295 and so i would not support the jurisdiction request. Okay. Move to deny the jurisdiction request. Okay, thank you. If you could call the roll on that please . We have a motion from commissioner fung . To deny this request and not evoke the subject matter jurisdiction. On that motion to deny president hwangs absent, commissioner hurtado . Aye. Vice president lazarus. Aye. Commissioner honda . Aye. Thank you. The vote is 40, and subject matter jurisdiction is not evoked, thank you. Thank you. Item four b is reschedule, and we will call four c. Subject property at 1980 golden gate avenue. Letter from raquel fox, attorney for john tynan, Kurt Mueller Jason thrupp, requestors, asking that the board take jurisdiction over bpa no. 2013 05 16 7130, which was issued on june 24, 2013; the appea
Italians and well as others living in San Francisco and contributing in San Francisco. And allowing a museum that gives the new development to permit the people from out of town to see San Franciscos commitment to diversity and San Franciscos commitment to the historical routes and if you do have jurisdiction to rule on the item to be an asset to San Francisco. Next speaker please . Good evening, lazarus and commissioners, my name is inaudible and i am a former president of the San Francisco Lawyers Association and also a life member. I am a former assistant District Attorney in the city and county of San Francisco. I am here comment on behalf of 706 mission and the Mexican Museum. Those of us who have been members of this community for so long, the Hispanic Community about been waiting for a very long time to realize a dream. You can be assured that the appeals are brought without permit, and they are indeed, frivilous on behalf of the Lawyers Association and the Hispanic Community an
The tenants were not aware that the permit had been approved until july 15th when the counsel fox happened to be checking the department of building inspection for another matter regarding inspections of the unit. The tenant filed this request for a jurisdiction on the same day after being notified that the permit was issued it was 16 days after it had expired, the reason that it was 6 days late because they rely on the notification, regarding the issuance of the permit and receiving notification from the Planning Department or from the permit holders themselves and the suggested changes are significant enough to require the approval of the permit and the change that the permit is seeking and including the foundation of the building and the floor joists. Tenant john who is a carpenter believes that this will take at least three months which is a significant amount of time for displacement and should be subjected to Planning Department review. The owners of the property have not been re
At the college of law and i am working under inaudible in the housing klen ing clinic and i will be representing these tenants of the golden gate Street Property and we request the jurisdiction because on june 4th they filed with the Planning Department requesting notification for all permits in the building after receiving notification that they were applying for a building permit. But before, the permit had been issued. And the tenants feared being displaced from the homes during the course of these renovations as they would have to leave the property during that time. The permit in question was issued on june 24th without any review from the Planning Department as a result of that, the tenants were not aware that the permit had been approved until july 15th when the counsel fox happened to be checking the department of building inspection for another matter regarding inspections of the unit. The tenant filed this request for a jurisdiction on the same day after being notified that t
June 4th they filed with the Planning Department requesting notification for all permits in the building after receiving notification that they were applying for a building permit. But before, the permit had been issued. And the tenants feared being displaced from the homes during the course of these renovations as they would have to leave the property during that time. The permit in question was issued on june 24th without any review from the Planning Department as a result of that, the tenants were not aware that the permit had been approved until july 15th when the counsel fox happened to be checking the department of building inspection for another matter regarding inspections of the unit. The tenant filed this request for a jurisdiction on the same day after being notified that the permit was issued it was 16 days after it had expired, the reason that it was 6 days late because they rely on the notification, regarding the issuance of the permit and receiving notification from the