it impeachment? does it move the need? i think the democrats are probably disappointed. because of the performance from mueller, i think it lights a fire under the need to speak to the people on his team who did the work. a lot of democrats in particular used the d word. and branded this a disaster. on optics this was a disaster. if you look who is winning and it seems like donald trump is winning. jason: because he is. joining us now is fox news contributor charlie hurt, media reporter for the hill, joe concho and doug schoen. gentlemen, thank you for joining us here. good to be here. jason: joe, i want to start with you because you are an expert in looking at the media. i think the media was a, disappointed and so frustrated they didn t get what they wanted. when i saunaed nad and pelosi do when i saw nadler and pelosi do the press conferences they were playing to media saying oops, we didn t produce what we said we would produce. i think bob mueller was a
including the president s daughter and son-in-law are cooperating and did not use private accounts exclusively for government business like then secretary of state hillary clinton. jason? thank you. as she reported, more harassment from house democrats is on the way. judiciary chairman jerry nadler said his committee is planning to enforce a subpoena against former white house counsel don mcgahn next week. joining us now with the reaction is the author of the upcoming book witch hunt: the story of the greatest mass delusion in american political history. and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. and author of why we fight, radio host sebastian gorka. thank you both for joining us tonight. sebastian, i want to start with you. this boomerang that is now in place with the mueller report coming up empty, that thing is going to come right back in to the face of the democrats based on what we can tell that the department of justice is pursuing. that is the origins of this case.
this is why it s so important what the inspector general is doing and what the attorney general barr is doing and certainly what mr. durham the prosecutor is doing in this. i want to talk about the other part of what catherine herridge talked about. that is this idea that they are going to issue a subpoena on dononatpo mcgahn to compel testimony in front of his committee. iou have to tell you, having been a chairman, if i issued a subpoena on neil eggleston then obama s general counsel the media would have laughed me off the planet there. would have been editorials about that. you don t have the ability to compel testimony from a general counsel to a president to appear before congress. you know, some applications of executive privilege are dubious. this ain t. right. this is the guy whose job is to provide privileged confidential advice and counsel to the president of the united states. it s clearly covered by executive privilege. if they think they can litigate this, good luc
including the president s daughter and son-in-law are cooperating and did not use private accounts exclusively for government business like then secretary of state hillary clinton. jason? thank you. as she reported, more harassment from house democrats is on the way. judiciary chairman jerry nadler said his committee is planning to enforce a subpoena against former white house counsel don mcgahn next week. joining us now with the reaction is the author of the upcoming book witch hunt: the story of the greatest mass delusion in american political history. and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. and author of why we fight, radio host sebastian gorka. thank you both for joining us tonight. sebastian, i want to start with you. this boomerang that is now in place with the mueller report coming up empty, that thing is going to come right back in to the face of the democrats based on what we can tell that the department of justice is pursuing. that is the origins of this
that because of pressure from someone? i don t know. after the three-year long russia hoax, conspiracy theories are nothing new for house democrats. in the end, there was no collusion. no conspiracy. and according to robert mueller himself, no obstruction. in fact, that determination was made without accounting for the office of legal counsel s opinion on charging a sitting president. still, chairman nadler continued to spread this lie. take a look. he told us in a remarkable exchange with mr. lieu but for the department of the justice policy from prohibiting him from doing so he would have indicted president trump. he knows better. he knows better! now with the democratic party effectively divided on impeachment, interparty tension is growing. speaker pelosi is reportedly trying to stop members of her party from attacking each other. this as pelosi and nadler