equity. right now, since comcast is the only land line provider in our area president chiu: 3 speaking on the side of at&t or the side of the appellants? on this side of at&t. president chiu: you will have an opportunity to provide public comment after at&t presents. this is a time to speak on behalf of the appellants. if anyone wants to speak on behalf of the appellants, please step up to the microphone. my guess is there are a lot of folks who checked the rahm box. the wrong box. you wish to speak to the appellants. robert longer, samantha wolf, toshira johnson, neal bardeck, brian webster. anyone who wishes to speak on behalf of the appellants, please step up. lawrence rosenfeld, 15-year resident of the inner sunset. on monday, april 18, at the at&t team came out to survey three sites in the inner sunset. the process consisted of asking us where we would like the boxes and telling us the reasons they were not satisfactory locations. for example, the challenges o
of them talked about locating them and one talks about installing equipment in them. that was my interpretation. i do not think it matters very much. the limited number i think is important. but even if it fits even if there is substantial evidence to support your staff that that is a reasonable interpretation, especially if there is a case i am not aware of on this particular point, there are exceptions. this exemption is in applicable is is not applicable when there is cumulative impact. all of the lists on class 3, they talk about three things, not 726 things. it is not just a trigger. the whole idea of a category is that these are things that should not create a problem. if there is a reason to think that there is some other environmental problem, that there may be a problem, supreme court case law says if you have evidence that there could be a significant impact, do not do the categorical exemption. i do not know if through the chair i need to wait for a question. p
only land line provider in our area president chiu: 3 speaking on the side of at&t or the side of the appellants? on this side of at&t. president chiu: you will have an opportunity to provide public comment after at&t presents. this is a time to speak on behalf of the appellants. if anyone wants to speak on behalf of the appellants, please step up to the microphone. my guess is there are a lot of folks who checked the rahm box. the wrong box. you wish to speak to the appellants. robert longer, samantha wolf, toshira johnson, neal bardeck, brian webster. anyone who wishes to speak on behalf of the appellants, please step up. lawrence rosenfeld, 15-year resident of the inner sunset. on monday, april 18, at the at&t team came out to survey three sites in the inner sunset. the process consisted of asking us where we would like the boxes and telling us the reasons they were not satisfactory locations. for example, the challenges of trenching where there are many tracks. bu