And former assistant second juliette kayyem. it s good to have you both with us. james as i said in the last hour you and i cooed together too many times in situations like this. this one sets up similar in terms of the profile of the kid what s known and unknown about the 17-year-old. let s put them to the side. the weapon analysis here is different than we are used to seeing. it s usually a high-round, high-capacity, high-power weapon used. how did he get it? he shouldn t have been able to get it that doesn t seem to be the case. two standard home defense weapons a shotgun and .38. the level of complexity is raised with the explosives. the fedding may take it over as a weapons of mass destruction case. texas has draconian laws here. he is looking at the death penalty he has been charged with capital murder, death penalty eligible. he didn t enter a plea but asked for an attorney. absolutely. now law enforcement right now, the most important thing is we are starting to rule thin
Without calling it a terrorist attack. having those things so children thought they might have been a grenade process. for it classified as a weapon of mass druks that could be a chemical component, biological ob radiologile or nuclear. anything with levels of explosives in it and things that could possibly put a biological hazard into the air or chemical hazard or something like that. and this is this murderer being 17, that would require a pass essentially on the age restriction which the u.s. attorney. yes. we have to find out more about that. but there is something straightforward about this case for this judge, that this man went in there, had the intent to kill and did exactly that. james thank you very much. let s take a quick break. still a lot ahead. we ll have a conversation with mark kelly, you know him the former astronaut and husband of gabby giffords. you want to stay tuned for that. because we re searching for the samances. how do we make the shooings