Test, test, test, test, test, test, test good morning, everyone the meeting will come to order. This is the tuesday july 18th of the transportation housing authority. Im erick im the chair of the committee and other supervisors. Able commissioner kim is on her way. Madam clerk can you call the role this is an action item. Thank you seeing no questions from my colleagues is there anyone from the public that would like to speak. Seeing none. Colleagues can we move this forward next item. Citizens advisory report that is an information item. And as always mr. Flanagan. Good morning commissioners my name is joseph im the c ac vice chair. There are 3 items on the agenda this morning the c ac took action on at our april meeting. We had 4 items on the june agenda that are on yourselves today. Items 4 and 6 were passed and that was unanimously by the c ac. Item 7 joint outreach strategy for the s f t p passed at the c ac by a vote of 9 to one. The c ac questioned the cost effects of outreach p
Supporting his nomination in september any other comments colleagues. So can we move mr. Marsh forward without objection thank you, mr. Marshall. Ms. Chang call the next item item 12 for the geneva Advisory Committee this is an action item. Good morning Committee Members this is on page 81 this is the project level c ac. The authority is leading project called the geneva feasibility study. It concerns a bus line on geneva and harry way connecting the station into San Mateo County connecting with the trans station and the new hunter point development. The line had been envisioned and the San Francisco admission transportation has been focused on the Infrastructure Improvements and making that service face and reliable. The study is a collaboration with the San Francisco agencies as well as the san mateo agencies concluding the Government Agency in San Francisco. The study escape includes a dedicated community to provide information on the community it will meet quarterly and it represen
In terms of that shorter deliver process. Given the challenges that mta has had and in delivering the projects in a time effective way why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket Scientist case. We can start to get some of the improvements only the ground and that will build more conversations we can deliver and tim can speak to i know there was a presentation speaking to the Mayo
Is to take vague of the federal map legislation 3 will help us to identify the local identification earlier and keep it within the document. A significant amount of effort was exerted in the vanessa document after the circulation and incorporating that into the final document we can save a significant amount of time. We think the project will allow early deployment of side running improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmor
Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket Scientist case. We can start to get some of the improvements only the ground and that will build more conversations we can deliver and tim can speak to i know there was a presentation speaking to the Mayors Office that theyre under talking to deliver the larger and Small Projects and a director for the strategic planning. I think supervisor wiener and other directors youve made the point very clear. Were acutely aware of this issue. Were looking