something like this? because this could be a very dangerous precedent. well, sure. the board could reject his offer. fundamentally what elon is arguing is that all of the changes that twitter has made over the past few years to make its platform safer are actually bad for the platform and actually bad for shareholders. i think shareholders have a different argument. i think shareholders have been pushing twitter to be the van garland of labelling misinformation, kicking off bad actors, moderating behavior, moderating speech. i think it is important to note that elon doesn t just think that dangerous speech is like whatever on twitter. in real life he has allowed dangerous speech like racist speech, violent speech to fester at his factories, which is why tesla is being sued for diss kim nation in california. he wrote a letter to his staff in 2017 saying, hey, if somebody
Maple syrup producers say 2022 hitting the sweet spot cbc.ca - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from cbc.ca Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.