Ever thought about what will happen to your home after you shuffle off this mortal coil? Sounds a bit dark, right? But let's face it, planning for the end
president trump where they gave you the gist of what the document was about. they gave you the classification level and they put in there of what the duration of his illegal possession of them was. is there any good reason? i can t think of one why we shouldn t get a similar itemized list to show there s one standard of justice, a similar itemized list showing every document obviously they re not going to tell us everything in it but the kind of information that they gave about trump. i think they ought to give about biden. give us and itemized list, tell us the classification levels and tell us how long he possessed them. martha: it s a great point, andy. when we see in the images in this indictment walls full of boxes, right? stacks of boxes in a number of different places. but then there s a section in this indictment which enumerates the classified documents, which you can fit in to half a box.
show the courts that these are often really sort of overextended claims. what concerns me about this response is that merrick garland is not offering even modest steps to assure the american people that this was not politically motivated. you can redact an affidavit. you can recognize that this is a unique historic moment. you can acknowledge that people have legitimate concerns given the history of the fbi and doj in trump investigations. garland is basically done none of that. he says we re not going to give you anything beyond the warrant and the itemized list. he could do more. for example, the trump team i thought made a reasonable request that they should have used a special master to separate out privileged material that was gathered under this really broad warrant. apparently the department of justice told them no. why? why wouldn t you want to do that
standpoint what should you do in response to xyz or pdq? there may be a hundred things they have looked at saying if he does this we will do that. this has been working for a couple months. you know, you can t take just the individual thoughts. if anyone comes on your show and says, here s what i think will be happening they re wrong because what you re talking about is a bunch of people who really have expertise in what might happen should mr. putin do a chemical strike, tactical nuclear strike, big tactical nuclear strike, something like that. it is just a determination of how to react or prevent an action by the enemy. that is what a tiger team does. so they are a whole host of possibilities that they are going through that they go through a whole host of different scenarios? they almost have an itemized list where it is a reaction to specific things. so they have said if mr. putin
Transcripts for MSNBC The Mehdi Hasan Show 20210510 00:30:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.