else being equal and at the same rate you would have roughly the entire population of france or the entire eligible population would be boosted and would have a significant level of protection against omicron. that really is the plan. there isn t a plan c. well, this is plan b. there isn t a plan c. in the meantime, countries like france have to figure out how they can slow down the rise not only of delta which appears to have peaked but the expected rise of omicron. france right now taking fairly light measures. they re canceling the fireworks display at the eiffel tower for new year s eve. other gatherings at new year s eve. that s very targeted. their long-term measure is they want to crack down on the unvaccinated. they want to exclude them from public spaces. it wasn t popular but the government deems it wasn t necessary and they want to turn the health pass into a vaccine
happy with her, there was an article called the grillo what where the black female was quit angry about the treatment of, here as pure it pointed out wha i did about how loyal black females are. i think the democratic party will feel their raft in the event that, let harris and the prospects of that are quite likely that she is not the person that would run as a president with the four. they are stuck with her at the reason they chose her as they can say checked all the boxes. a black and a person of color. it wasn t because she was confident. she did when a single primary impact she pulled out before th first caucus in iowa. it wasn t popular among california. could raise any money. she checked all the boxes and other stuck with her. this list of possible replacements are all mostly white men. it s not going to fly. they are stuck with her. larry, you know about hard outs. really have about 20 seconds bu
progressive caucus in line. i think putting out the framework ahead of the trip was a way of signaling we ve got to wrap this up. here s a framework hopefully everyone can agree to. and i think it s significant the progressive caucus came out and endorsed it even though it did not include things like prepaid family leave, and the number is lower that progressives wanted and progressives are suggesting they will get by via sinema and manchin. but if they don t, you will see the president continue the conversations and maybe even make another visit to the hill. if this becomes law and is significant, it could have real impact. the problem the democrats have is they re running now. they re running in virginia now. they re dealing with the midterms next year. it s going to take a long time for these policies to be implemented. look at the way obama care took forever to get done. it got done march 2010. it s more popular now. it wasn t popular then. are they going to see any political ben
absolutely dishonest as to what kind of tax it is. i mean, the national insurance is nothing that it says it is. and it is the most unjust tax where what they have ended up doing is getting young, low paid workers to pay for preserving the wealth of richer, older people, so that they can keep their homes and pass on their inheritance, and that is mostly paid by people of working age, a lot of whom haven t got homes, haven t got assets and capital. this country is incredibly wealth heavy, particularly in the older generation and the obvious thing to do is to go for reform of wealth tax, which labour had proposed back in 2010. it wasn t popular then, might not be again, but i think people are coming round to the idea that actually, where the wealth is,
doing is getting young, low paid workers to pay for preserving the wealth of richer, older people, so that they can keep their homes and pass on their inheritance, and that is mostly paid by people who are working age, a lot of whom has haven t got homes, haven t got assets and capital. this country is incredibly well heavy, particularly in the older generation and the obvious thing to do is go from the reform of wealth tax, which labour had proposed back in 2010. it wasn t popular then, might not be again, but i think people are coming round to the idea that actually where the wealthiest, the broadest shoulders is where the tax should fall. and i wouldn t be surprised within a short time if. and labour has its annual party conference coming up. if we don t hear someone talk about labour putting forward some more taxes that will affect those who have the most assets.