the efforts of the many fbiand y agents and other law enforcement personnel who are assigned to these matters. personnethey are working couragn and steadfastly and are serving our nation honorably. anitee mike , given what we ve learned about some of these prosecutors and agents, goingn back to the mueller investigation, frankly, even before tha that,elievet, will ae believe this? and it soundacs likeademy it ws the academy awards, only the only person i didn t think was his agent and his manager. there e. anyone can remember laura , one of the attorneys on the pleadings on this case was a former democra staffert sr in the senate. and so obviously, obviou, that t prosecutor has a political bias and she is a prosecutor namedpae on the pleadings. thisnt that went is the same jue department that went to aased biased magistrate judge bruce reinhardt, who had just recusedr from president trump sum civilso lawsuit against hillary clinton six weeks prior because thatased
0 an that s all the time we have tonight. i really appreciate sean r allo mhannity for allowing mec in his seat . i hope you re abl e to check out my podcast. n i ve been jason in the house. yu just type jason in the house. anywhere you listen to podcast ,i think you ll like it.am angle sean will be back on monday . the ingraham angle is coming up next. and i hope you have a great and wonderful, blessed holiday weekend. stay with us. ingar. , ev everyone, i m laura ingraham. wo this is ingram angle fromfriday washington. thank you for joinin night. g un a friday night. now we r g to have full coverage of the dodgerspo continued political targeting of president trump in moments. i but first, nodaw we re going to kick off this friday a little bit differently with the return of the worst in media. so media? what s that?media well, it sbi easy to become numb to media bias. thes we ree days. offender so we re going to keep track of the very worst offenders every chance we get .oj
we speak to a former federal prosecutor now. thank you for joining us. from a layman s perspective it strikes as a significant case if this is the case live as a former prosecutor, has significant is this? it prosecutor, has significant is this? , , prosecutor, has significant is this? ,, ,, this? it is significant because it was hunter this? it is significant because it was hunter biden. - this? it is significant because it was hunter biden. if- this? it is significant because it was hunter biden. if it - this? it is significant because it was hunter biden. if it was j it was hunter biden. if it was a non presidential air it would be a routine tax case meaning the allegation seems to be that hunter biden did not pay his full amount of taxes. he has since paid those taxes and normally these cases are settled civilly without criminal charges being brought. in this case we will see whether that happens. one charge is another one. when you apply for a gun in the united states have to a
right to refuse to answer questions that they claim may incriminate them. indeed, respondent eric trump invoked his right against self incrimination in response to more than 500 questions during his one day deposition. that deposition over trump was necessarily the same case. they weren t fighting to try to protect eric trump the way they are now fighting to protect the rest of the trump s. trump lawyers desperately argued that the only reason the attorney general james is investigating is because she doesn t like donald trump. to which, the judge said that, as has often been, said that it prosecutor dislike someone does not prevent a prosecution. it is not unusual for prosecutors to hate the person they are prosecuting. the validity of the prosecution turns entirely on the evidence. to that point, that judge said that the office of attorney general s investigation is
argued that the only reason the attorney general james is investigating is because she doesn t like donald trump. to which, the judge said that, as has often been, said that it prosecutor dislike someone does not prevent a prosecution. it is not unusual for prosecutors to hate the person they are prosecuting. the validity of the prosecution turns entirely on the evidence. to that point, that judge said that the office of attorney general s investigation is hardly unsubstantiated. indeed, this courts in camera view of the thousands of documents responsive to the office of attorney generals prior subpoenas demonstrates that the office of attorney general has a sufficient basis for continuing its investigation, which undercuts the notion that this ongoing investigation is based on personal animus, not facts and law. so, there is the judge, again, saying that he has personally