In Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, the Federal Circuit held that the wording "a microprocessor" does not require there to be only one microprocessor in an open ended claim; however, subsequent.
In FS.com Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed an International Trade Commission decision finding a Section 337 violation. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Commission’s enablement determination and infringement determination.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed an International Trade Commission decision finding a § 337 violation. The Court concluded that the Commission correctly found.
In Cooperative Entertainment, Inc. v. Kollective Technology, Inc., the Federal Circuit held that useful improvements to computer networks can be patent eligible even when standard.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a jury's noninfringement verdict, finding that the district court correctly interpreted the article "a" and antecedent "said" in the asserted claims to require that a single microprocessor be capable of performing every one of the recited microprocessor functions.