saying oh insurance policy that they were all in to do this. this was, of course, their presumption, their sloppiness was born out of overconfidence. they presumed she would win. they got a little nervous so they wanted that insurance policy. but they felt comfortable, kimberly, to be as sloppy as they were because they felt the system would, in fact, make this happen. this is what is so shocking about what the american people did last year and why they can t adapt. this is their issue. and, also, i would say that for when it comes to the republicans, i appreciate congressional investigations there is a place for those. clearly, if there was ever a special counsel required, it s regarding the obama and hezbollah connection as well as uranium one. i know again sessions is looking into the fbi dynamic with uranium one. these are crimes that are actually so shocking we are still trying to get our mind around them. these are the things they knew they would need to cover for. this is what
ages like peter strzok saying insurance policy, they were all in to do this. this was their presumption. their sloppiness was born out of overconfidence. they presumed she was when she would win buy they felt comfortable, kimberly, to be as sloppy as they were because they felt the system woulds makt happen. this is what is so shocking about what happened and why they can t adapt. this is their issue. also i would say that for when it comes to the republicans, i appreciate congressional investigations, there s a place for that. clearly, if there was ever a special counsel required, it s regarding the obama and hezbollah connection, as well as uranium one. i know, again, sessions is looking into the fbi dynamic with uranium one. but these are crimes that are so shocking, still trying to get hero mind around them. these are the things that they knew that they would need to cover for. this is what ben rhodes is so shocked about. did things during the eight years and this is why, by th
nativity scenes on private property. why is there an even distance that we must merge religion and state to celebrate holidays. it is best done on private property. jon property. this ends up being about bullies. what iit s about imposing a dynamic that you want to feel as though you belong in a society where you are a minority. and ultimately it s about trying to change the face of the majority to meet you because you can t adapt. i think that this nation is tolerant, and this is about a fully dynamics. they are not being bullies, they are asking for the same rights that christian groups had for 50 or 60 years. your goal is to push them out. tell christian groups to get more aggressive. put in more applications, it s an open process it treats everybody fairly. it s not all but,. it s not going to be about the dominant religion either. it s about free speech for everybody and freedom for
mantra 2, prevent that to which you can t adapt. everything that we re seeing around us now is the result of a planet that s warmed about one degree. but the same climatologists who told us that would happen say unless we get off coal and gas and oil very, very quickly that one degree will be four or five degrees before the century is out and most of it locked in very, very soon. we need, above all else, to be working, working desperately to turn off coal and gas and oil and move to renewable energy. it s not impossible thing to do. technologically we know how to do it. last month there was a day in which germany generated more than half of its energy to solar panels from within its borders. that shows me that we can do this technologically. what we lack is political will. that s why we build movements like 350.org. you know, last year we managed to pull off the biggest civil
premium that exists on adaptability and ability to adopt when a man keeps on bringing people in who can t adapt. it s a great point you make. i call it pinstripe protection is. we should have said maybe the way the stock market worked in the past, it s not going to work in the future. what they say is we want to make sure the economy keeps working the way it was before because we were making lots of money. the fact we still have the same guys at the head of citigroup is a shame. much less the guys atop the administrations of 12 years ago. if nothing else, it continues to break the cognitive disdense for those who voted for change with barack obama and perhaps has been in denial that he has