mm-hmm. most administrations doing their job to the best of their abilities. when they got something wrong, usually they apologized, or they say, you know, we can do it better. this administration always points to some other thing, and they don t want to take responsibility for it. then they double down on it, and they marginalize people by stirring up hate and anger and division. i just don t get it. right. it s not even a they. it s a he. i think that a lot of his administration certainly he has enablers. i mean well, a little bit. but i m saying the men and women who are doing the work on the border. oh, no. they re not echoing his sentiments. the guy i had on tonight with his little cheap trick saying i was disrespecting the cbp. that s tired. that s not going to work on my show. the idea they have to own what the president says, that s not fair to them as well. and the idea that this is a democrat type of thing, these kinds of problems, this is what democrats cau
mm-hmm. most administrations doing their job to the best of their abilities. when they got something wrong, usually they apologized, or they say, you know, we can do it better. this administration always points to some other thing, and they don t want to take responsibility for it. then they double down on it, and they marginalize people by stirring up hate and anger and division. i just don t get it. right. it s not even a they. it s a he. i think that a lot of his administration certainly he has enablers. i mean well, a little bit. but i m saying the men and women who are doing the work on the border. oh, no. they re not echoing his sentiments. the guy i had on tonight with his little cheap trick saying i was disrespecting the cbp. that s tired. that s not going to work on my show. the idea they have to own what the president says, that s not fair to them as well. and the idea that this is a democrat type of things, these kinds of problems, this is what democrats ca
mocking her accent as she was readings to little children. all right. so tonight, right here on this show, we are laying down the gaunt let. we will fight fire with fire. we will show you video proof of kimmel wants perverted and my so misogynistic and racit past. that is tonight s breaking news opening monologue. let me say this at the start of the show tonight, i am going after jimmy kimmel tonight. we re going to pound him with his own words. and i m going to tell you something. this is not something i prefer to do on this show. i don t take joy in this, but i have just had it with the utter hypocrisy. the unrelenting attacks against not only a sitting president, but his wife and his daughter and his 11-year-old son. the first lady of the united states really? this never ends. it needs to end. this is not about politics, this isn t republican, democrat, conservative, liberal. it s way bigger than sean hannity or jimmy kimmel. what we have is jim mill
to immigration and if we don t get them changed. this isn t politics. this isn t republican and democrat. this is common sense. so it has to be taken care of. sandra: this is an issue that is so personal to you obviously. in a border state. the president, his strategy here i would ask you is it working? there you have him tying the ms-13 to the need for immigration reform. is he doing all the right things to get democrats to come around on his thinking on this? absolutely. he is raising awareness on these very real issues impacting communities around the country. yesterday the focus was ms-13. 10,000 gang members in 40 states and washington, d.c. people that are being brutally murdered within miles of the capitol in our communities. the laws have to be changed. right now dhs officials cannot deport somebody because they are a gang member. they can t have them be inadmissible because they are a
king. i m not saying this as a matter of hindsight. we were saying this in real time as it was going on. you did what you could do. why didn t the president of the united states at the time you were making your attribution or thereafter speaking to the american people and say a foreign power is interfering in our affairs, this isn t democratic, this isn t republican, they need to be rejected and they need to stop. why wasn t that done? was there thought given to that? why was that rejected? again, congressman schiff, we did make the statement. we were very concerned that we not be perceived as taking sides in the election, injecting ourself into a very heated campai