no-fly zone zone there. what about what what and from my perspective, if we show putin s snoo you re from this side. you re not alone in this. some people say he only understands one type of conversation and that s force. j.t.: i know so many experts on russia who are saying other things but you took to gary casparov, talk to electiony any al knee, talk to and all those people that you talked about live under the threat of death. please stay safe. thanks for coming on the show. coming up, reup inned questions about the future of the democratic party leadership as the end of an era appears to be approaching. you re watching meet the press
has been quite flar spectacular. but ut malt. at some point this conflict will be over but snoo of course, people in russia aren t seeing the same imams that we re seeing because the. they are turning into teachers who do not back the car. a pan nfrm so, look, this is very stalinesque. one, it s not totally unexpected because there s so much a lack of information that s getting there. the russians are rallying around the flag based on the information that they are learning from their own state media. but still at the same time we must try any means we can to
will create a contrast with rudy giuliani and, you know, lev parnas and all of these crazy characters running around, running an alternative foreign snoo policy. john, we have to call senator schumer out for his disingenuousness and you brought this out about impeachment in 1998. you asked him, wait a minute, you weren t for new evidence back then, you are for now. new witnesses no, now yes. that s different because that was basically an illegitimate impeachment. his behavior versus today, he is saying, it has to do with the president s behavior. can i jump in. there is a difference. in 1998, everyone who was a fact witness senate a grand jury and testified under oath with the starr investigation. there were no new witnesses. there were no new facts. that s fair. we haven t heard from most of the people who have firsthand information. that s fair, joe, but what he s arguing here is, i didn t
elsewhere. these political contributions were part of the way it appears that they sought to establish those political connections. what we don t know is, to what extent, if at all, rudy giuliani was involved with these people and the business dealings that they were trying, the business deal, they were trying to achieve in ukraine. rudy giuliani said these are his client snoo clients. hold that thought. tom, where does this go next? we re going to see these men are we going to see these men in court? these charges filed by the united states attorney office for the southern district of new york. the federal prosecutors here in manhattan. they re going to appear in virginia first because they were arrested at dulles airport last night as you were just speaking more information from my colleague joe valket, the two were arrested on an outbound flight so they were on their way out of the country when they were arrested according to joe. one of the other individuals taken into custod
international affairs. the wall street journal reports that the call never mentioned a provision of aid. frank did he glues i and legal analyst had a very different take on whether a quid pro quo was different. frankly, this is very mob-like. it s all tied together and that was made clear to ukraine. it didn t have to be in one conversation. it s clear that the review of the aid to ukraine was tied to whether or not they complied with this. it can be an implicit quid pro quo. i think here it s pretty explicit. it doesn t have to be a direct cited quid pro quo. it could be inferred, it could be implied by trump and inferred by the ukrainian. that s a criminal problem that the president is facing. so could that case be argued, that it wasn t directly offered in a conversation? could it be charged as one snoo. i ve defended these cases.