Reproductive health at georgetown millions of dollars to look at the efficacy of fertility beads for Family Planning purposes and there has been evidence now that those do work, they are efficacious and we can fund those as a tool to use to reach our goals in Family Planning. Obviously were going to have a whole lot of other tools. But that particular tool is acceptable by many religious groups opposed to the other tools. And so i think that is one positive story that we might look at replicating. Do we have other questions from the audience . Right here in the middle. Hi. My name is jana carp, im hear from the state department. And it has come up a couple of times in terms of the ebola crisis in west africa but i was wondering if you could speak more generally about the role that faithbased groups could play in pandemic preparedness and response and sort of Lessons Learned from ebola in the past year, two years. Other questions . Again, my name is rosemary, i just go back to the coope
I very much welcome the tone of the foreign secretarys remarks. This now opens the way for iran to play a constructive role in regional shares and noting that we have a profound common interest in defeating dinesh and the reactions from reality. Will we do not use the opportunity to employ the full british diplomacy to force intelligent, effect incorporation between riyadh and tehran towards a common strategy to defeat daish appeared he is quite right it is to achieve a measure reconciliation between saudi arabia and constructive engagement between those two important regional powers in addressing many challenges facing the region. That will not happen overnight. Hes absolutely right the measured tone of the response we heard from saudi arabia in stark contrast to the last measured response was heard from elsewhere in the region and is promising and i spoke last night we will maintain our engagement doing two things. Encouraging allies in the arab countries around the goals to be willi
After benefiting from charities, after negotiating we were after protecting our National Interests and we were after engaging in a just bargaining process in order to maintain our National Interests. We have always stressed that this is not going to be a winlose negotiation. Its not i mean, its not you see one side becoming a winner victorious, the other side becoming a loser. If its a winlose negotiation its not going to be sustainable agreement. We do not come up with a sustainable agreement. In order to attain a sustainable agreement, they should be a winwin situation for both parties, both sides. We did clarify that as our negotiators have been have started talks and negotiations 23 months ago in order to have an achievement in the course of negotiations, we were in need of domestic and national consensus. It is quite clear that politicians, associations, political factions, they do not share common views, but with respect to to items pertaining to our National Interest and Nationa
Deal with. To over simplify just a little bit, the issue is not just Irans Nuclear program, the issue is iran. And we need to be careful that our efforts to resolve this issue doesnt worsen the other dimensions of the problem. Now let me focus on the Nuclear Portfolio per se. If i were here with a butcher paper or something and drawing a pert chart as to how do you get from here to there with there being a Nuclear Weapon on the part of the iranians i would have three critical paths. One path would be delivery vehicles. The iranian Ballistic Missile program. Another path would be weaponization, making a device small enough and rugged enough and confident and reliable enough that you put it in a nose cone. And the third path is material, the things you need to actually have a bomb. We have chosen to bet the farm on blocking one path. We have chosen to bet our future here on blocking the path toward the creation of missile material. The other two paths ballistic material, Delivery Systems
Going from here. Michael bloch and of course the Nicole Petallides done at the new york stock exchange. Why dont you start us off. We talk all the time about resistance in markets that the reference to the s p 500. It does seem to be some resistance anonymous 20 k. Number. Its true. Well it easy to get to remember, you dont have that. You have to breakthrough. You need a catalyst to push you through that number. But the lack of Trading Volume about 60 under a trading average and the headlines are not really giving the boost spirit 16 year high of 21point. One is optimism on trumps policies with some better earnings. The idea is the consent is a 20,000 is coming in the near term. Connell exactly. Hovering around for quite some time. We spend so much time having conversation about what happens afterwards. Thats kind of what we do this time of year. What is item one would he think the most about. The backbone driving the market lady it is kind of a positive they think we are moving from l