tonight on all in. it should be the entire nation who determines who they want for president, whether they re guilty of insurrection or not. donald trump asked the supreme court to save him from getting kicked off the ballot. plus are you better off than you were four years ago? the republican front runner convicted of fraud has a new sleight of hand. were you better off five years ago? where you better off five years ago? where you better off five years ago, are you better off today? tonight, speaker emerita nancy pelosi on america s choice in 2024, former obama campaign manager david plouffe on whether or not liberals an open primary should vote nikki haley to stop donald trump. and the new all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes, and happy new year. it s good to be back here with all of you. thanks to the folks who filled in, i really appreciate it. we are now, officially, at the beginning of an election year, the promise is to be
L JUST IN: Court declares seats of 25 Rivers Assembly members vacant hallmarknews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from hallmarknews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
saying, hey, come ready to talk about some stuff that might be in the amicus. here s the argument from that brief. the court should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. under controlling supreme court precedent, and interlocutory order, which is what they are seeking, denying immunity in a criminal case is not immediately appealable unless they claimed immunity rests upon an explicit statutory or constitutional guarantee that the trial will not occur. what do you think of the argument? it looks strong. there are very few such immunity guarantees. we know of two, i believe, a speech or debate clause, double jeopardy. those are the two that are enumerated. there are others that the courts have said do not exist, so other types of immunity, that have been shot down by the courts. presidential immunity, of course, has never been tested in the courts. right, he is saying because
Recently, the Allahabad High Court held that an order of interim maintenance during the pendency of application under Section 125 CrPC is not an interlocutory order and thus, can be challenged before.
The Madras High Court has held that an order of trial court allowing an application filed by the prosecution seeking extension of remand of accused is not an interlocutory order but a final order.